I'll clarify:
The question asks you to prove that
[tex]\Gamma(n+\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{1.3.5.7...(2n-1)}{2^n}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
We can sort of see this in the 5/2 example, all the numerators are odd numbers and the denominator is always 2, so the odd numbers will multiply successively n-times on the top and 2 will be of the power n on the bottom, and always at the end is the square root of pi. To prove this first "assume" that it is true for any number say, k.
[tex]\Gamma(k+\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
We assume this is true, and now we try to prove it for k+1, we want the next odd number to appear on the numerator and for another 2 to be multiplied in the denominator (or half on the numerator) to make the right hand side look like this:
[tex]\frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)(2(k+1)-1)}{2^{k+1}}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
Once this happens all we have to do is show that the equation holds for n=1 and then we get it true for n=1,n=1+1 etc.
From the relationship we established,
[tex]\Gamma(n+1)=n\Gamma(n)[/tex]
We can add 1 quite nicely:
Remember that we have assumed that
[tex]\Gamma[k+\frac{1}{2}] = \frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
So for k+1:
[tex]\Gamma(k+1+\frac{1}{2}) = (k+\frac{1}{2})\Gamma(k+\frac{1}{2})[/tex]
(k+1/2 is n here.)
[tex]\Gamma(k+1+\frac{1}{2}) = (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
Now all we need to do is rearrange it
[tex](k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi} = \frac{1}{2}(2k+1)\frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
Notice that we have a half and a 2k+1, which if you look is actually (2(k+1)-1), our next odd number.
[tex]\frac{1}{2}(2k+1)\frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)}{2^k}\sqrt{\pi} = \frac{1.3.5.7...(2k-1)(2(k+1)-1)}{2^{k+1}}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
So if it's true for k it is true for k+1, if you prove it for k=1 you have proved it then for all positive n.
[tex]\Gamma(1+\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} = \frac{1.\sqrt{\pi}}{2^1}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow \Gamma(n+\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{1.3.5.7...(2n-1)}{2^n}\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]
For positive n.
Edit: The final part of the proof would just be manipulating the expression to match the RHS.