Understanding Hurricane Warnings & Damage Potential Along the Gulf Coast

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Hurricane Don, which is expected to make landfall as a category 2 storm at the Texas/Louisiana border. The larger hurricane warning area compared to the forecasted hurricane force winds is due to uncertainty in the storm's exact landfall location. If the hurricane hits as predicted, the most damage is anticipated to occur to the right of the storm's center. There is skepticism regarding the likelihood of the storm rapidly intensifying to a category 4 before landfall. Accurate forecasting remains challenging, highlighting the inherent uncertainties in predicting hurricane behavior.
salma17
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Assume that Hurricane Don forms into a category 1 hurricane and is positioned in the Gulf of Mexico as shown in the figure below. The 24 hour forecast is for Don to make landfall at the Texas/Louisiana border in 24 hours as a category 2 storm. (The states of Texas and Louisiana are labeled with TX and LA on the map).
The hatched area on the coast marks the areas forecasted to get hurricane force winds. The area on land between the two W’s marks the coastal areas that are put under a hurricane warning by the National Hurricane Center. Why is the hurricane warning area much larger than the area forecasted to get hurricane force winds? Assuming that the hurricane does make landfall exactly where predicted, where along the coast would you expect that the most damage will be done? Based on the current state of hurricane forecasting, discuss the possibility of the storm surprising forecasters and rapidly strengthening to a category 4 storm before hitting the coast.

I have no idea why the hurricane warning area is larger than the area forecasted to get hurricane force winds. Please help me :(
 

Attachments

  • map.jpg
    map.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 448
Physics news on Phys.org
Is every weather forecast guaranteed to be 100% accurate?
 
nope
 
help, anyone?
 
You were already given help and you already gave at least the partial answer to the problem. Just follow this line of thinking. Any conclusions you can draw from the fact predictions are not accurate?
 
I think I figured it out. The hurricane warning area is larger than the area forecasted to get hurricane force winds because there's still considerable uncertainty as to the exact landfall location of the Hurricane.Assuming that the hurricane does make landfall exactly where predicted,the most damage will occur to the right of the storm's center.The possibility of the storm rapidly strengthening to a category 4 storm before hitting the coast is unlikely.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top