Understanding Impulse and Conservation of Energy in Bouncing Ball Collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the impulse experienced by a 5.00kg ball dropped from 1.20m that rebounds to 0.700m. The initial attempts involved calculating the ball's momentum before and after the collision with the floor, but the results were incorrect. Participants suggest using the conservation of energy principle to determine the velocities needed for accurate momentum calculations. The original poster acknowledges confusion over using an incorrect physics equation and expresses intent to retry the calculations using the suggested method. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying correct physics principles for accurate results in impulse calculations.
xrotaryguy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I don't know why I'm getting the wrong answer on this one.

A 5.00kg ball is dropped from rest from 1.20m above the floor. The ball rebounds .700m. What are the magnitude, and direction of the impulse or the net force applied to the ball during the collision with the floor?

So I started by finding the velocity of the ball just before and just after hitting the floor.
ch7no11c.gif
ch7no11d.gif


I use that to find the momentum of the ball before and after hitting the floor.
ch7no11e.gif
ch7no11f.gif


I find the diference between the two momentums and viola! Wrong answer :rolleyes: haha.
ch7no11g.gif


The answer is supposed to be 4.28N*s

What am I doing wrong? :cry: :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops, I found velocity with a physics equation that doesn't exist. :-D However, using the V=sqrt(2ax) formula, I still get the wrong answer...
 
Last edited:
xrotaryguy said:
Oops, I found velocity with a physics equation that doesn't exist. :-D

Yes, you wrote pretty weird things down. :smile:

Use, for example, conservation of energy to get the velocities you need.
 
radou said:
Yes, you wrote pretty weird things down.

Yeah, and I worked so hard at those images too :P

Ok, I'll try conservation of energy.

Thx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top