Understanding integration with trig identities, and absolute value

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of trigonometric identities in integration, specifically the relationship between sin(x) and the square root of 1 - cos²(x). It highlights that while sin(x) can be expressed as ±√(1 - cos²(x)), the absolute value is often overlooked in integration contexts, leading to potential confusion. Participants express concern about the teaching of absolute values in mathematics, noting that this concept complicates the isolation of sin(x) from the identity sin²(x) + cos²(x) = 1. Examples are provided to illustrate how textbooks typically ignore the absolute value when performing substitutions in integrals. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding these mathematical principles.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In integration, we are allowed to use identities such as sinx = \sqrt{1-cos^2x}. Why does that work, and why doesn't make a difference in integration? Graphing \sqrt{1-cos^2x} is only equal to sinx on certain intervals such as(0, \pi)and (2\pi, 3\pi). More correctly, shouldn't we use the absolute value of \sin\left({x}\right)?

sin^2x = 1 - cos^2x
|sinx| = \sqrt{1 = cos^2x}
or defined piecewisely = {\sin\left({x}\right) in regions where it is above the x-axis, and -\sin\left({x}\right) in regions where x is below the x-axis.

Is it possible to even truly isolate "sin\left({x}\right)" from
sin^2x = 1 - cos^2x? It seems as the |sin\left({x}\right)| is the closest we can to isolate it.

Sorry if I may seem confusing, but the concept of absolute value still confuses me.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide an example? All I feel like I can tell you right now is that you're right, sin(x) is not sqrt(1-cos^2(x)) and that you cannot make that claim in integration either, but I don't know the whole story.
 
Well, I was just thinking about this, nothing more. Actually, I don't think this pertains too much to integration, since no one in the right mind would use that substitution. But how would someone isolate sinx from cos^2x + sin^2x = 1, there seems to always be an absolute value in the way. And I really don't think schools teach absolute value well, or at all. I've been taught that the square root of something results in +/-, but it wouldn't make sense that sinx = +/- sqrt(1-cos^2x).

But in generally, in integration, I usually see the books ignoring the absolute value. For example, ∫ x^5\sqrt{1-x^3} dx, you can make the substitution 1 - x^3 = z^2. The square root of z^2 would be the absolute value of z, but they just use integrate z instead.

Also, in ∫\frac{\sqrt{x-x^2}}{x^4} dx, if you use the substitution x = \frac{1}{u}, then you'll end up with -∫ \sqrt{\frac{1}{u^2}(u-1)}u^2 du, and the \frac{1}{u^2} simply becomes \frac{1}{u}. Also, when calculating arc lengths, such as y^3 = 8x^2 from 1 to 8, sqrt(x^(-2/3)) becomes x^(-1/3).

I apologize for the long message, I got addicted to use LaTeX.
 
Last edited:
Dethrone said:
Well, I was just thinking about this, nothing more. Actually, I don't think this pertains too much to integration, since no one in the right mind would use that substitution. But how would someone isolate sinx from cos^2x + sin^2x = 1, there seems to always be an absolute value in the way. And I really don't think schools teach absolute value well, or at all. I've been taught that the square root of something results in +/-, but it wouldn't make sense that sinx = +/- sqrt(1-cos^2x).

But in generally, in integration, I usually see the books ignoring the absolute value. For example, ∫ x^5\sqrt{1-x^3} dx, you can make the substitution 1 - x^3 = z^2. The square root of z^2 would be the absolute value of z, but they just use integrate z instead.

Also, in ∫\frac{\sqrt{x-x^2}}{x^4} dx, if you use the substitution x = \frac{1}{u}, then you'll end up with -∫ \sqrt{\frac{1}{u^2}(u-1)}u^2 du, and the \frac{1}{u^2} simply becomes \frac{1}{u}. Also, when calculating arc lengths, such as y^3 = 8x^2 from 1 to 8, sqrt(x^(-2/3)) becomes x^(-1/3).

I apologize for the long message, I got addicted to use LaTeX.

Anyone have any insights as to why this is true?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K