Understanding Joint Probability Model

pamparana
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am trying to understand a paper and am stuck at one place.

The statement says something as follows:

Say we have a, b, c and d which are random variables generated by some model. This leads to the following joint probability model:

p(a, b, c, d) = p(a|b)p(b|c,d)p(c)p(d)

I do not understand the RHS of the equation at all? What is it saying and quite confused as to how it is derived?

Would be very grateful for any help you can give me.

Thanks,
Luca
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pamparana said:
Say we have a, b, c and d which are random variables generated by some model. This leads to the following joint probability model:

p(a, b, c, d) = p(a|b)p(b|c,d)p(c)p(d)

I do not understand the RHS of the equation at all? What is it saying and quite confused as to how it is derived?
Luca

probability of (a conditional on b) times probability of (b conditional on c,d) times the joint probability of c and d.

You say "some model" If they provided no further information, take it as a given. Conditioning on c,d and multiplying by the joint probability are two different operations.

EDIT: In calculating for conditioning on two or more variables, you try to marginalize one of the variables:

P(A|B,C)=P(A,B,C)/P(B,C)=P(A,B,C)/P(B)P(C|B)=P(C|AB)P(A,B)/P(B)P(C|B)=P(A)P(B|A)P(C|AB)/P(B)PC|B).

This is less complicated then your example with four variables, but it shows the concept of marginalization of P(B) and P(C).
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top