Understanding Laplace Transforms: Solving Problems and Applying Properties

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Laplace transforms, specifically addressing issues with obtaining answers in the expected form and the application of properties such as linearity and convolution. Participants are exploring the transforms of functions involving exponential and hyperbolic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to reconcile their results with provided answers, questioning the steps needed to transform their expressions. There are inquiries about the definitions of hyperbolic functions and their relevance to Laplace transforms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on simplifying expressions and referencing definitions. There is a mix of understanding regarding the properties of Laplace transforms and the definitions of hyperbolic functions, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their prior knowledge.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention a lack of familiarity with hyperbolic functions and their definitions, which may impact their ability to compute Laplace transforms effectively. There is also a reference to external resources for further reading.

LostEngKid
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all, 2 questions here

1) I've been doing some questions on laplace transforms and have been running into some trouble getting my answers into the same form as the answers given with the questions.
For example:

f(t) = 1 - e^(-t)
Using the linearity property i got 1/s - 1/(s-1) which is correct? But the answers give 1/s(s-1). Later in the lecture notes they show how to do the inverse laplace transform of the answer they gave and use partial fractions to get it into the form of the answer I got, i was just wondering what they have done to go from my answer to their answer, what steps am i missing?

2) f(t) = sinhtcosht, does this involve convolution or is that only when doing the inverse laplace transform where L(f)L(g) = f(t)*g(t)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its been a while since I've looked at Laplace transforms, but is the LT of e^-t not 1/(s+1) instead of 1/(s-1)?
 
1) Try and simplify your expression using a common denominator of s and (s-1).

2) Do you know the definition of sinh(t) and cosh(t) in terms of exponentials?
 
oops yeah i did mean 1/(s+1) danago

and Pere i wouldn't have a clue about sinh(t) and cosh(t) a exponentials, maybe i should have paid more attention in first year maths
 
LostEngKid said:
oops yeah i did mean 1/(s+1) danago

and Pere i wouldn't have a clue about sinh(t) and cosh(t) a exponentials, maybe i should have paid more attention in first year maths


If you don't know about the definition of sinh(t) I don't see how you could calculate its LT..

[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \sinh t =& \frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}\\<br /> \cosh t =& \frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2}<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

For some background reading you could have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_trigonometric_function" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There should be a table of Laplace transforms which you can refer to check LT of sinh and cosh. But in any case, Pere Callahan's post is sufficient for you to do it, so long as you know the LT of e^t and e^-t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K