Understanding Laws of Logs: How to Derive Chemistry Kinetics Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mycotheology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt.
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}.
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mycotheology said:
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt.
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}.
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.

The red part is the wrong part.
By reverse you use e as a index for exponentiation, so let's say :
ln a = ln b - c
e^(ln a) = e^(ln b - c)
u got your exponentialtion wrong.
 
mycotheology said:
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and here's something I don't get. How does this:
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/Grafik/ord1-6.gif
get turned into this:
[A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt.
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}.
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.

The easiest method to see this is to apply the exponential to each side.

##
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& -kt\\
\displaystyle e^{ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0}}&=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle \frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle [A] &=& [A]_0 e^{-kt}\\
\end{eqnarray*}
##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top