Understanding Line Intersections and Reflections in Collision Detection

  • Thread starter Thread starter sundar0206
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines
sundar0206
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have been coming across a very very basic mathematics problem and still can't get my head around it. Should admit not the best to really talk maths to but I need the following

I am doing a collision detection algorithm..

For this I have a point that moves .I got the position of the point. But then here is the problem.

How do i really find where the vector in which the point moves intersect with a line...

If It intersects I need to reflect the vector..

Would be really nice to help me out in this issue..

Also can someone explain to me how the equation of the line AX+BY+C = 0 y=mx+c and the normals related ...

Also how does one fine a line perpendicular to another..

Well too many question and very unordered. Sorry about that . Jus typed all the questions on my mind

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sundar0206 said:
For this I have a point that moves .I got the position of the point. But then here is the problem.

How do i really find where the vector in which the point moves intersect with a line...

If It intersects I need to reflect the vector..
I haven't studied vectors in great detail, so I'm finding it hard to understand exactly what you're saying here, however, I will give it a shot and hopefully it'll be along the lines (no pun intended) of what you're looking for.

If a point is moving along a plane, defined by some function y=f(x), it will intersect the line ax+by+c=0 if and only if there are real solutions for x (and thus y also) that satisfies both functions.

e.g. particle moves along y=x^2, to find if it intersects 3x-y-2=0 simply solve these simultaneously. i.e. substitute y=x^2 into the line equation.

Hence,
3x-(x^2)-2=0
x^2-3x+2=0
(x-2)(x-1)=0
x=1,2

So the intersections are at x=1 and x=2. Finding the y-value, sub these x-values back into one of the functions. So, y=1^2,2^2 Therefore the points of intersection are (1,1) and (2,4).

To find the angle at which the particle traveling along y=x^2 'collided' with the line, find the gradient of the tangent at the point of collision and the gradient of the line by the use of calculus.

Lets just take the point (1,1).
y=x^2
dy/dx=2x
At x=1, dy/dx=2

So the gradient is 2 while the gradient of the line is... y=3x-2 comparing to y=mx+b where m is the gradient, hence, 3.

Now use the formula tan(\theta) =\frac{tan(m_1)-tan(m_2)}{1-tan(m_1)tan(m_2)}

where m1 and m2 are the graidents and \theta is the angle of intersection.

The reflection of the vector would just be 180^o-\theta



Also can someone explain to me how the equation of the line AX+BY+C = 0 y=mx+c and the normals related ...
If you re-arrange and solve ax+by+c=0 for y...
by=-ax-c

y=-\frac{a}{b}x-\frac{c}{b}[/itex]<br /> <br /> so as you can see, the gradient of y=mx+k is m, while the gradient of ax+by+c=0 is -\frac{a}{b}<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Also how does one fine a line perpendicular to another.. </div> </div> </blockquote>First find the gradient of one line by calculus or, better yet, doing it the way just above. Then use the formula (m_1)(m_2)=-1<br /> Basically, for 2 lines to be perpendicular, their gradients must multiply to give -1.<br /> <br /> For the general line above, <br /> ax+by+c=0<br /> <br /> y=-\frac{a}{b}x-\frac{c}{b}<br /> <br /> The gradient for the normal of this line must be m_1=\frac{-1}{m_2}<br /> <br /> So, \frac{-1}{-\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{b}{a}<br /> <br /> Hence, y=\frac{b}{a}x-\frac{c}{b}
 
Thanks for that post . I really appreciate the time you have taken to reply to my quesiton...

I understand how ax+by+c and y=mx+c are related. But then How is this related to the normals of the line..Is this somethin I have missed or not understoond
 
Hmm...

The only actual relationship one can give between any line and its normal is that their gradients multiply to -1

So if you have a line y=mx+k_1 the normal would be y=\frac{-1}{m}x+k_2

I'm not sure what else there is to say. If you're still unsatisfied, please, try and elaborate your problem a little further and I'm sure you'll get more help :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top