Understanding Lovelock Gravity Theory and Riemman Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I read about lovelock gravity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovelock_theory_of_gravity

I don't undestand how generate a Riemman tensor R_{ijkl} in the expression:

\delta^{abcd}_{ABCD}R^{AB}_{ab}R^{CD}_{cd} = R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl}-4R_{ij}R^{ij}+R^2
`
\delta^{abcd}_{ABCD} is the generalized kronecker delta,

i understan that a term

\delta^a_A \delta^b_B \delta^c_C \delta^d_D R^{AB}_{ab}R^{CD}_{cd} = R^2

but , for example
\delta^a_A \delta^b_B \delta^c_D \delta^d_C R^{AB}_{ab}R^{CD}_{cd} ??

for example , how i find the term R_{ijkl} ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
use the defination of the generalized kronecker delta as determinant
 
In your second example all you did was switch C and D. The Riemann tensor is antisymmetric on C and D so this term is just -R2. To get a term like RabcdRabcd you would need to use for example RCDabRABcd.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top