Understanding Mach's Principle and the Existence of Objects in the Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter KendallAngel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
KendallAngel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
"Imagine a machine which is a box with a door. Place an object in the box, shut the door, and the machine shields all interactions between the object and the universe. When I open the box, what will I see? Will it be the same thing I would see if I had placed nothing in the box before closing the door?
For something to exist it must continually interact with everything else in the universe. This is Mach's principle."

This comment was made in a physics forum , that's true?
source: http://lofi.forum.physorg.com/Do-Things-Exist-When-The-Are-Not-Perceived_20591.html?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
KendallAngel said:
For something to exist it must continually interact with everything else in the universe. This is Mach's principle."

Mach's principle is rather imprecise - I read somewhere there are at least 21 versions.

The above however is not one I recall.

Certainly QM does not demand it although some interpretations suggest something along those lines.

Thanks
Bill
 
Bhobba's answer pretty much says it all. This thread is closed, as there is no need to debate claims based on an unacceptable reference. We can usefully discuss the historical significance of Mach's Principle, but that's not this thread.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top