Understanding Mass-Energy Equivalence to Fdx and dm in E=mc^2

rrrright
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi I was wondering if anyone could help me with this equation.

Fdx &= dm c^2

First of all, excuse me for my limited knowledge of calculus, but how exactly can you just use the numerator of a derivative? What do Fdx and dm mean if they are not in respect to anything? Do they simply mean a change in x and a change in m?

Secondly, I have seen this equation used to get to E=mc^2 through integration. How exactly do we integrate either side of this equation? What is the step by step process for doing this? Again, please excuse my limited math knowledge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Splitting the derivatives is technically not kosher in math; however, physicists do it all the time. I think there are probably weird pathological functions (such as discontinuous everywhere functions or some such) where splitting the derivative will lead to the wrong answer, but physics usually only deals with well behaved functions. Usually something like dx just means a small displacement in x.

You can immediately integrate that expression to obtain W=mc^2. Integrateing Fdx gives you the work and integrating d(mc^2) just gives you mc^2 back (sorta like the fundamental theorem of calculus).
 
rrrright said:
Hi I was wondering if anyone could help me with this equation.

Fdx &= dm c^2

First of all, excuse me for my limited knowledge of calculus, but how exactly can you just use the numerator of a derivative? What do Fdx and dm mean if they are not in respect to anything? Do they simply mean a change in x and a change in m?

Secondly, I have seen this equation used to get to E=mc^2 through integration. How exactly do we integrate either side of this equation? What is the step by step process for doing this? Again, please excuse my limited math knowledge.

Hi, welcome on board!

For the answers, look at the first file in my blog. It explains the differentiation as well as the physics you are asking about.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top