Understanding Math Notation: Unions and Intersections Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oddbio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Oddbio
Gold Member
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
In my math book, I am seeing a few things like this:

For any set I, and any family (A_{i})_{i\in I} of open subsets, the union \cup_{i\in I}A_{i} is also an open set (any union of open sets is open);

I also see one later like:
\cap^{n}_{i=1}A_{i}

But I always thought that a union (and intersection) had to be of the form:
A\cup B or A\cap B

So the first one has nothing on the left side, same as the second one.. but the second one also has super and sub-scripts?
Do they mean something completely different than "union" and "intersection"?

I apologize if this is a trivial question.. it sure feels like it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The notation of the form \cup_{i\in I}A_{i}, means that you have a family of sets A_i, and you do the union of all of them. i.e.,

\cup_{i\in I}A_{i} = A_1\cup A_2\cup...
 
Actually I guess that isn't strictly true, since the family of sets doesn't have to be countable, but I hope you get the idea.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top