Understanding MC1496 Modulator for AM Radio Transmitter Receiver

  • Thread starter Thread starter mralam
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The MC1496 integrated circuit is identified as a balanced modulator suitable for AM radio transmitter and receiver designs. It operates by multiplying the carrier signal with the input audio signal to produce a double sideband suppressed carrier signal. The circuit requires careful adjustment of the carrier null to achieve the desired modulation without completely nullifying the carrier. While the MC1496 can be used for AM modulation, it may not achieve 100% modulation efficiency, and subsequent amplifiers must be linear to maintain signal integrity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AM modulation techniques
  • Familiarity with the MC1496 integrated circuit
  • Knowledge of balanced mixers and their applications
  • Basic electronics skills for circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "MC1496 circuit design for AM modulation"
  • Study "AM modulation techniques and efficiency"
  • Explore "linear amplifier design for RF applications"
  • Investigate "single sideband (SSB) modulation methods"
USEFUL FOR

Electronics hobbyists, radio frequency engineers, and anyone involved in designing or understanding AM radio transmitter and receiver circuits.

mralam
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
hi,

i came across this issue while working on a project. I am designing and AM radio transmitter receiver. While doing some research i found that the best way to do it is to use an MC1496 IC i also found the circuit attached to this post as a way to set it up.

Now before i go and build the circuit does anyone have an idea of how the circuit works and how does the MC1496 produces an AM signal?

Is it just a multiplication of the carrier signal with the input signal?

Any explanation will be great.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    14.4 KB · Views: 6,025
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's been a while since I've done any work with a 1496. The 1496 is a BALANCED modulator and according to the schematic you've posted it is set up to do just that. It will produce a double sideband suppressed carrier signal. The carrier null adjustment is used to do just what it sounds like. However, in your case you do NOT want to null the carrier. I don't know if you can just tweek the carrier null pot to get what you want or if you would be better off searching for something else. Any AM modulator (no matter what people try to tell you) is circuit that multiplies as you have eluded to. Do a search on AM (especially if you include my username) and you will find at least one lengthly discussion with more than enough disagreement to go around.
 
Thanks for your help. I will do the search and get back to you
 
Just wondering why an AM transceiver as AM is not used much these days? Narrow band FM, Single Sideband or digital modes are the ususal modes for two way communications. Aircraft are one of the few users left using AM. The usual way of producing AM is to 'modulate' the DC supply to the final class C amplifier...high level modulation.. I am not sure an MC1496 will allow modulation anywhere near 100%. As has been said it is a balanced mixer which can be used to generate supressed carrier AM which is usually then filtered to remove one sideband to produce SSB..Single Sideband.

If you use an MC1496 or an another way of modulating at a low RF level following amplifiers will have to be linear.
 
Last edited:
i was going through my dads boxes and found a box full of mc1496 and he asked me to do something with it. I found that i can be used as an AM modulator. And therefore i started researching it. What i need to know is how does it work in terms of hardware. How is the modulation done based on the circuit that i have attached to this post?
In other words i am trying to analyze the circuit and try to undestand how it produces the AM signal.
 
Sorry Averagesupernova i wasnt able to find any of the posts that you have mentioned in an earlier post??
 
http://www.ece.uAlberta.ca/~decorby/lab2_2003T.pdf
 
Here is the thread I was referring to: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=38928

I finally lost interest. Incidentally, the 1496 is mentioned in the thread. My 'opponent' in the thread has since deleted his username or whatever. I must say I have never been so frustrated in a thread as I was in that one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K