Understanding minimal substractio for several variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
for one dimensional integral \int_{0}^{\infty}dxf(x) i know how to make minimal substraction however for an integral in several variables how is it done ??

for example for a triple integral

\int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty}dx dy dz f(x,y,z)

i must perfrom

a minimal substraction in 'x'

a minimal substraction in 'y'

a minimal substraction in 'z'

i know how to make this however what is the following step ?

a minimal substraction in 'x,y'

a minimal substraction in x,z

a minimal substraction in y,z

a minimal substraction in x,y,z

this is the part i do not know how to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "minimal substraction"?
 
mathman said:
What is "minimal substraction"?

minimal substraction is that given a divergent integral we must substract some terms to make it convergent.

for the case of 1 dimension is very VERY easy , the problem is when you have more than one dimension
 
One way would be to convert to spherical coordinates. Then the problem would be one-dimensional, since ∞ appears only for the r integral.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top