Understanding Molecular Motion: Diffusion of Phospholipids in Bacteria

  • Thread starter Thread starter SUchica10
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Phospholipid molecules in a monolayer exchange positions every 10^-7 seconds, with diffusion across a bacterium taking about 1 second over a distance of 2 micrometers. The diameter of a phospholipid head is 0.5 nm, raising questions about the consistency of these diffusion rates. In a hypothetical scenario where a lipid molecule is the size of a ping pong ball (4 cm), it would move at a speed of 144 km/h, taking approximately 1.5 seconds to cross a 6-meter room. The discussion emphasizes the need for algebraic calculations to analyze both biological and scaled scenarios. Understanding these molecular motions is crucial for grasping diffusion processes in bacteria.
SUchica10
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Within a monolayer phospholipid molecules exchange places with their neighbors every 10^-7 seconds. It takes about 1 second for a phospholipid to diffuse from one end of the bacterium to the other, a distance of about 2 micrometers.

A) Are these numbers in agreement? Assume that the diameter of a phospholipid head is 0.5 nm. Explain why or why not.

B) To gain an appreciation for the speed of molecular motions, assume that a lipid molecule is the size of a ping pong ball (4 cm diameter) and that the floor of your living room (6 m by 6 m) is covered wall to wall in a monolayer of balls. If two neighboring balls exchanged positions every 10^-7 seconds how fast would they be moving in km/h? How long would it take for a ball to move from one end of the room to another?


I am not sure where to begin with these and what type of equations to use. If anyone can at least help me begin thatd be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well at least part B is straightforward algebra. A ping-pong ball moves 4cm every 0.1us. What is that velocity in units of km/hr? At that speed, how long does it take for a ball to travel the 6m to go from wall-to-wall?

Then I guess you're supposed to use a similar analysis to check the numbers for the biological dimension case in part A. Does that help?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top