Understanding Newtonian Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational effects experienced by a point mass within a massed shell or ring. It is established that a point mass inside a spherical shell experiences a net gravitational force of zero, similar to the behavior of electric fields in a Faraday cage. When considering a point mass within a ring of uniform density, the net gravitational force remains zero due to the symmetry of the ring; forces from opposite points on the ring cancel each other out. However, the distinction between a spherical shell and an annulus is crucial, as the shell theorem specifically applies to spherical shells, not rings. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately calculating gravitational forces in different geometrical configurations.
Quantumsatire
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
So for a point mass in an enclosed shell, the net force of gravity is zero (similar to electricity in a Faraday cage I presume). However, what happens when that point mass is placed in side the ring of mass m and uniform density. Say the outer shell has radius r and inner shell has radius x, so the region r-x is a massed shell/ring. How would you find the net force of gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the outer shell alone gives you a net force of zero, then it can be ignored.

You only consider the inner shell and calculate your force in the normal way.
 
Quantumsatire said:
So for a point mass in an enclosed shell, the net force of gravity is zero (similar to electricity in a Faraday cage I presume). However, what happens when that point mass is placed in side the ring of mass m and uniform density. Say the outer shell has radius r and inner shell has radius x, so the region r-x is a massed shell/ring. How would you find the net force of gravity?

Net gravitational force on point mass by ring will be always zero. Consider the entire mass of ring as small point equal masses. For every point mass on ring, there will be another point mass symmetrically opposite on the ring. Net force by two opposite masses on the point mass inside cancel out. Thus, net gravitational force is zero
 
Quantumsatire said:
So for a point mass in an enclosed shell, the net force of gravity is zero (similar to electricity in a Faraday cage I presume). However, what happens when that point mass is placed in side the ring of mass m and uniform density. Say the outer shell has radius r and inner shell has radius x, so the region r-x is a massed shell/ring. How would you find the net force of gravity?

Do you mean spherical shell or an annulus? They are not the same and the shell theorem only applies to a spherical shell.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top