Understanding Newton's Laws in Non-Inertial Reference Frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that Newton's Laws of Motion are applicable in non-inertial reference frames, such as an accelerating car, as explained through the equivalence principle of General Relativity. When a car accelerates, objects inside appear to change motion due to the frictional force acting on them, which is a result of the car's acceleration. This principle confirms that all objects, regardless of their state of motion, are influenced by forces, maintaining the validity of Newton's Laws in these scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with General Relativity and the equivalence principle
  • Basic knowledge of forces and motion
  • Concept of non-inertial reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equivalence principle in General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of non-inertial reference frames on motion
  • Investigate frictional forces and their effects in accelerating systems
  • Read about practical applications of Newton's Laws in everyday scenarios
USEFUL FOR

High school science teachers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the application of Newton's Laws in non-inertial reference frames.

pkc111
Messages
224
Reaction score
26
Hi,

I was wondering if someone could explain things simply to me (sorry, I am a high school science teacher and not really into the high level maths side of things).

I would like to ask if the General Theory of Relativity says anything about objects obeying Newtons Laws in non-inertial reference frames. A lot of the sources I've come across say that it confirms that Newtons Laws are obeyed in ALL reference frames - including non-inertial ones -hence its name "General" theory of relativity.

But I don't get how the laws are obeyed in a car accelerating from a traffic light- where objects appear to change their motion without an applied force.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

The general theory of relativity is based on the equivalence principle that says that acceleration is equivalent to a gravity field. If, for this discussion, we ignore Earth gravity, an accelerating car can be considered stationary in a constant uniform gravity field. Everything outside the car is free-falling in this gravity field and constantly accelerating backwards. Things inside the car are either free-falling in it, or held by the matter of the car that applies a force equals to m*a on them.

You can read about general relativity here:

http://www.polarhome.com:763/~rafimoor/english/GRE.htm

The article is informal and does not use higher mathematics.

Regards
Rafi
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pkc111 said:
Hi,



But I don't get how the laws are obeyed in a car accelerating from a traffic light- where objects appear to change their motion without an applied force.

Thanks.

They do have a force - its the frictional force - If you put your briefcase on the car seat and accelerate your car - the briefcase also gets accelerated because it is pushed by the friction of the seat or becasue it contacts the backrest - try putting some wheels or bearings on your lose items in the car and accelerate - they want to stay at rest so they slide backward when you accelerate forward - when you are stopping, they slide forward. Things at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by some force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K