Understanding Norton Method: A Question on Negative I in KCL Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in analyzing a circuit using the Norton method, specifically addressing the interpretation of current directions and the resulting signs in equations. Participants explore the implications of current flow conventions and how they affect circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a certain current "I" is considered negative, expressing confusion over the direction of currents entering and leaving a node.
  • Another participant provides an equation relating the currents into and out of the node, suggesting a specific interpretation of current flow.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about how to determine the direction of currents, suggesting that the current "I" should be directed upwards into the node.
  • Another participant clarifies that current direction can be chosen arbitrarily as long as the same convention is consistently applied, explaining how this affects the equations used.
  • One participant asks for clarification on the conventions used for current flow and the conditions under which different voltage differences (e-v vs. v-e) are applied in calculations.
  • A later reply suggests drawing simple circuits to better understand current flow and encourages the use of external resources for further learning.
  • Another participant reiterates their understanding of Ohm's laws but expresses difficulty in applying them due to unfamiliar symbols in the circuit analysis.
  • One participant explains that the direction indicated by the current source symbol affects how currents are summed, noting that a current flowing out of the node is marked as negative in the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the direction of currents and the implications for KCL analysis. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of current flow or the associated signs in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various conventions and symbols that may differ from standard representations, leading to confusion in applying KCL and Ohm's laws. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations regarding current direction and its impact on circuit analysis.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
why "I" is negative??

http://img391.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img8855ew6.jpg

i know that KCL says that the sum of the currents that goes in
equals the sum of the currents that goes out

here i don't know what current goes into the node
and what current goes out??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
current in = current out
I (current into node) = (e-v)/R1 + e/R2 (current out of node)
 
i don't know how you decided the direction of each current

i am new to this stuff
and i think that the "I" current is pointed up
so it goes into the node
the second current the goes threw "R1" also come into the node
because the currect goes from the plus of the battery to minus of the battery

where did i go wrong
 
you can make current go any way you want as long as you stick to the same convention throughout the circuit (this is just something to keep in mind)

In this case, you have 3 lines in your circuit with respect to that node. Current is not pointing up. That is just a symbol for current. It says current is flowing in that line going that direction. It is going 'into' the node. What goes in must come out equally. If it goes in 1A, it has to come out 1A.

Now, if you want to make current at R1 going into the node, you can do it too but then the convention changes.
ie:
going in = going out
I + (v-e)/R1 = e/R2
e/R2 - I -(v-e)/R1 = 0
e/r2 -I +(e-v)/R1 = 0

Observe the sign symbol; -(v-e) = e-v
see how it comes back the same? When current flows one way, then your I is the voltage differential (from) - (to). If you made R1 current 'going into', it will be (v-e)/r1. If you made R1 current 'going out' from node, it will be (e-v)/R1.

Hope this helps
 
what conventions?

i can't see how the currents flow using these conventions

in what case we have e-v and in what v-e
?
 
delete

It would be best if you draw a simple circuit, with voltage and 1 resistor. What is the current? What happens if you add 2 resistor in series now. What is the current and voltage between both resistor. Keep adding, another resistor in parallel with 2 resistor in series and find current/voltage ...etc

Try this site
Read thru it
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_6/4.html. Take a look at ohms law, simple current and voltage rules.
 
Last edited:
i know ohm laws

but here i can't construct them
because of these new symbols
they differ the normal symbols
 
transgalactic said:
i know ohm laws

but here i can't construct them
because of these new symbols
they differ the normal symbols

I'm not sure I understand your confusion. The symbol on the right is a current source. The arrow on the symbol shows which way the current is flowing through the current source. The "up" arrow means that the current is being pumped up from ground and into the top node.

The equation the way you have written it is summing all of the currents flowing *out* of that node, so the current from the current source leg of the circuit is marked as negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K