Understanding Observing Frequency and Its Significance in Radio Astronomy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of observing frequency in radio astronomy, particularly regarding how it relates to redshift and the emission mechanisms of celestial objects. It clarifies that while a radio telescope detects emissions in the radio band, this does not necessarily indicate the physical activities occurring within the observed galaxy, such as Cygnus A. The conversation highlights that the term "radio galaxy" is standard in astronomy and emphasizes that these galaxies can emit across the electromagnetic spectrum, not just in radio frequencies. Additionally, the distinction between radio and x-ray galaxies is questioned, focusing on whether their differences stem from redshift or emission mechanisms. Understanding these concepts is crucial for interpreting astronomical observations accurately.
shirin
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I believe that when we say that this is radio telescope, it means that reciving frequency of it is in radio band. And also it means an observed object by that is in a particular redshift that its emission has a particular frequency that when receives us, is in radio band. Am I right?
For ex. We say cynus A is a radio galaxy. But it doesn't mean that it emits in radio freq. So it doesn't give us any info about physical activities happening in the galaxy, it just tells us about its distance from us.
Sorry for my confusing question! I'm just wondering observing fre just tells us about distance?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is true that "it doesn't mean that its emission has a particular frequency that when receives us, is in radio band." However, the rest of what you say, in particular "it just tells us about its distance from us" seems to be assuming that what we receive as "radio band" is redshifted visible light. That is not in general true.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Are all the radio galaxies in the (approximarely) same distance from us? And is the reciveing frequency from all of them in radio band?
I am wondering whether the difference between a radio and x-ray galaxy is their redshift or their emission mechanism ?
 
Can you cite where you have seen these terms "radio galaxy" and "x-ray galaxy" and such? I am not familiar with them as standard terminology, but it could be something I haven't heard until now. Also, I think this thread belongs better in the Astronomy and Astrophysics section.
 
Oh, you are right! I'm sorry, I was supposed to post them in astronomy section.
Thanks though!
 
Matterwave said:
Can you cite where you have seen these terms "radio galaxy"

That is an extremely standard and common term in astronomy
in another thread earlier today I posted an example ... The Centaurus A radio galaxy

Cen_A_multiwavelength_7.jpg
as can be seen, it pumps out masses of EM right across the spectrum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_A

Cygnus A (3C 405) is a radio galaxy, and one of the strongest radio sources in the sky. It was discovered by Grote Reber in 1939. In 1951, Cygnus A, along with Cassiopeia A, and Puppis A were the first "radio stars" identified with an optical source. Of these, Cygnus A became the first radio galaxy; the other two being nebulae inside the Milky Way.[2] In 1953 Roger Jennison and M K Das Gupta showed it to be a double source.[3] Like all radio galaxies, it contains an active galactic nucleus.

Images of the galaxy in the radio portion of the electromagnetic spectrum show two jets protruding in opposite directions from the galaxy's center. These jets extend many times the width of the portion of the host galaxy which emits radiation at visible wavelengths.[4] At the ends of the jets are two lobes with "hot spots" of more intense radiation at their edges. These hot spots are formed when material from the jets collides with the surrounding intergalactic medium.[5]
cheers
Dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes shirin
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top