Understanding P-V Diagrams: Work Done and Heat Input in a Closed Loop Process

Click For Summary
In a closed loop P-V diagram, the relationship dQ = dE + PdV holds true, with dE being zero in a cyclic process. The work done by the gas can be calculated for different processes: zero for constant volume, nrT ln V for constant temperature, and P(V2-V1) for constant pressure. Since the change in internal energy is zero, the heat input equals the work done by the gas, confirming that heat in equals work done. The net heat flow into the system is defined as the heat flow from the hot reservoir minus the heat flow to the cold reservoir. This understanding clarifies the connection between work done and heat input in thermodynamic cycles.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2
in a close loop P-V diagram,

dQ = dE + PdV right?

so if i want to get the net work down by the gas , i just need to find the Work done for each process right?

but my dE is always 0 since cyclic process,

so for constant volume,

WD = ∫ PdV = 0

for constant temperature,

WD = ∫ PdV = nrT∫ VdV = nrT ln V

for constant pressure,

WD = ∫ PdV = P(V2-V1)

so since dE is 0, heat input = work done by the gas right? since from First law,

heat in = change in internal energy + work done by the gas

so in calculating the work done by the gas, i am calculating the heat input right?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning looks correct to me: for a cyclic process whereby a fixed quantity of ideal gas is returned to its initial (P, V) coordinates, the net change in internal energy is zero. \Delta U = Q - W = 0, so Q = W.
 
quietrain said:
so since dE is 0, heat input = work done by the gas right? since from First law,

heat in = change in internal energy + work done by the gas
What do you mean by heat in? Qh or Qh-Qc?

\Delta Q = W. The net heat flow into the system = work done by the system. The net heat flow into the system is the heat flow from the hot reservoir (Qh) minus the heat flow to the cold reservoir (Qc).

So:

W = \Delta Q = Q_h-Q_c

AM
 
ah i see thanks!
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
472
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K