Understanding Particle Interactions with Scalar and Vector Fields

webb202
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Can anyone help with an ongoing argument we are having. When a particle interacts with a vector field e.g. the electric field, it experiences a force trying to move it which depends on the particle charge and the local field condition, - but when it interacts with a scalar field e.g. the Higs field, it just gets a return value ,- no movement - the contention is that whilst it is interacting with the scalar field it cannot move, movement is only allowed with vector fields. This could be the start of an explanation for inertial mass!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question. My first guess would be that a scalar field would not have directional information and is symmetric with respect to any direction (including changes in the direction of motion). But a vector field does have directional information. So any interaction with a vector field would change a particles direction.
 
How about the good old Newtonian gravitational field? The field phi is a scalar under Galileitransformations (not under accelerations, but that's no problem), and its gradient gives the force experienced by particles.
 
The field Phi is an analytical construct, particles experience only the vector at a given moment, only by moving do they experience the gradient
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top