Understanding Potential Energy and Functions: Verification and Clarification

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmmcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 1K views
cmmcnamara
Messages
121
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

So I do feel a bit silly with this question, but I've just begun to realize the relation ship between potential energy and potential functions...

So just quickly, would the following relationship be considered true:

[tex]\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}=\nabla\phi[/tex]

and by breaking apart the vectors, generally:

[tex]\frac{d\vec{p_s}}{dt}-\frac{d\phi}{ds}=0[/tex]

Just wanted a quick verification and/or push in the right direction.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually there's a negative sign in the first equation, because we define potential energy as decreasing along the direction of force. Otherwise, your logic is correct.
 
I'm not sure I understand the negative sign, wouldn't that be dependent on the orientation of the force (eg, if my net force is pointed upwards from earth, potential energy increases with height).
 
The gradient gives the direction of increase of a scalar field.

When the scalar field is potential energy, the force is always defined as the direction that potential energy decreases. Hence, a minus sign is required.