Understanding Poynting's Theorem intuitively

  • Thread starter Thread starter sigma_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Poynting's theorem illustrates the conservation of energy in electromagnetic systems, emphasizing the relationship between energy density, work done on charges, and energy flux. The energy flux is quantified by the Poynting vector, which represents the flow of electromagnetic energy. However, this energy flux is not necessarily classified as radiation; it can also describe non-radiative scenarios. Moving charges can create electromagnetic fluctuations that dissipate quickly without generating traveling waves. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the nuances of energy transfer in electromagnetic contexts.
sigma_
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
understand that, broadly speaking, Poynting's theorem is a statement of conservation of energy.

There are many forms of the theorem, so I will simply give my current intuitive understanding of it in words:

Energy density of a volume of current and charge decreases proportionally to work done on charges within the volume and by energy flux through the surface bounding the volume.

The energy flux term is the area integral of the Poynting vector.

My question is this: is this energy flux that is described by the Poynting vector a form of electromagnetic radiation? If not, how is energy radiating out of the charge and current distribution if not by work done on charges? By what agency is this energy density being exhausted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sigma_,

I'd hesitate to call the energy flux described by the Poynting vector "radiation", since the Poynting vector is often used to describe non-radiative situations. Radiation occurs when the EM fluctuations come from a traveling wave, which is also called a self-propagating wave.

Merely moving a charge without essentially accelerating it also produces EM fluctuations, but those fluctuations are effectively evanescent waves. They dissipate very quickly. Both of types of waves of course involve the same EM fields, and by the Poynting theorem the same type of energy is fluctuating in either case.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top