Understanding Redox Reactions: Balancing Multiple Reductions and Oxidations

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed redox reaction, both cadmium (Cd) and nitrogen (N) are reduced, indicating a complex process. It is possible for multiple atoms to be reduced or oxidized simultaneously, but this typically involves separate parallel reactions. For a valid redox reaction, both reduction and oxidation must occur concurrently. The presence of dilute acid, such as HNO3, can facilitate these reactions. Accurate calculation of oxidation numbers is crucial to ensure the balance of the reaction.
hiturtle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am supposed to balance the following reaction:
CdS + HNO3 (dil) → Cd(NO3)2 + NO + S + H2O

After writing out all the oxidation numbers for each atom, I found that Cd and N are both reduced (Cd5+ → Cd 1+ and N5+ → N2+).

I am wondering how to approach this problem. Is it possible to have 2 atoms reduced? Is this what the dilute acid does?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show how you calculated oxidation numbers for Cd and S.

Yes, it may happen that more than one atom gets reduced or oxidized, but in such situations it usually means there are two separate, parallel processes going on - and they can be described by two reaction equations. However, for the redox reaction to proceed you need BOTH reduction and oxidation to be taking place at the same time. So if you have found only elements that are being reduced, there is for sure something wrong.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top