Understanding Rotations on a Polar Grid | Geometry Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter mactony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
When rotating an image on a polar grid, the angles for the bottom half can be represented as 180 degrees to 360 degrees, or alternatively, as 0 degrees to -180 degrees, depending on the reference direction. The polar grid encompasses a full rotation of 0 to 360 degrees, covering both the top and bottom halves. For mapping points from the top half to the bottom half, the angle can be expressed as a negative value, such as -75 degrees, or as an equivalent positive angle over 180 degrees. The choice of representation depends on the desired orientation and reference direction. Understanding these conventions is crucial for accurately mapping points during rotation.
mactony
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,


I'm rotating an image 105 degrees on a polar grid. I know the top half of the polar grid is 0 degrees to 180 degrees, but what about the bottom half? Is it the same as the top 0 degrees to 180 degrees, or does it go all the way to 360 degrees.

Oops, forgot to clarify in case my question is too vague. Ok, let's say I have an image on the top half of the grid which is 0 degrees to 180 degrees. I have to rotate it , and the new figure would end up on the bottom half the grid. Polar grids are shaped like a circle. I have to map the points of the original image and the new image. Would the bottom image points be 180 degrees to 360 degrees or 0 degrees to 180 degrees.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Generally, you would have the polar angle covering 0 to 360 degrees for a full rotation (i.e. it covers both top and bottom) but there is nothing wrong with 0 to 180 (counterclockwise) on the top and 0 to -180 (clockwise) on the bottom starting from the same reference direction (x-axis).
 
So if I was mapping the points, would it be -75 degrees for example, or would it be over 180 degrees, I am just rotating an image.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top