Understanding Standing Wave Basics for Non-Physicists

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between standing waves and natural frequency in rods, emphasizing that oscillation at natural frequencies leads to the formation of standing waves due to increased bounces. It also seeks clarification on how transient time during continuous vibration relates to these concepts. The importance of natural frequencies in determining the behavior of vibrations in materials is highlighted. Additionally, the transient response provides insights into how quickly a system can reach steady-state vibrations. Overall, the thread aims to simplify complex physical concepts for better comprehension.
yerpo
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
As I https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=283482", I'm struggling with physical basics of vibration in rods as a non-physicist.

If someone would be kind enough to explain in simplest possible terms, I would like to understand two things:

1. What is the relation between standing waves and natural frequency for a given substrate? (except that oscillation at one of the natural frequencies is more likely to form standing waves because it bounces back and forth more times)

2. What does the transient time of continuous vibration tell me about either?

Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Water Waves Over Obstacles: Higher Frequencies Grow, Not Decay
Replies
3
Views
1K
Components of standing wave between harmonic frequencies
Replies
1
Views
1K
I How do we excite specific standing waves on a string?
Replies
11
Views
4K
Understanding Standing Waves in Open Tubes
Replies
1
Views
2K
Critical frequency of Faraday Waves?
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Mechanism of Energy Conservation in Zero-Amplitude Sum of EM Waveforms
Replies
12
Views
634
I How is the direction of a harmonic wave expressed?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Where are the pressure nodes on a standing acoustic wave in water?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Understanding Strings: Basic Concepts Explained
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Macroscopic versus microscopic standing waves
Replies
16
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top