Understanding Statistical Probability: The Mistake of Overestimating Rare Events

  • Thread starter Thread starter Probabil1ty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Probabil1ty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to know the name of one little phenomena to learn more. I don't know how to explain it clearly, so please try to understand what i am trying to know.

The problem is: When you find a very low probability event you think about it like some kind of miracle, but you did not expected any kind of event, so this is not and question of math.

EXAMPLE(imagine a normal life situation): you standing on a street and doing nothing(waiting a friend) and you see a car with a vehicle registration plate with number 111, after a couple of minutes you see a car with number 112. And you think "O my god ! wow ! the probability of seeing those two registration plates is like one to million !" But you were not making an experiment on observing registration plates. You were not expected to see that numbers. Event has already happened and after that you made this conclusion. So this is completely wrong to say that it was kind a miracle and one to million probability.

So my question is: what the name of that mistake? I think this is an interesting topic and want to learn more.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this is simply a poorly run counting experiment. that particular event (seeing 111 then 112) does indeed have a probability of something like one in a million. But the probability of seeing any two numbers that are very alike, for example (n,p,m,) then (n,p,m+1), is much, much higher than one in a million.

if you really want to learn more about this mathematically, go ahead and calculate the probabilities of finding such events. that would be interesting to see.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top