Understanding Subspaces: Criteria and Examples (R3, Integers, R2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rijad Hadzic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the criteria for determining subspaces in R3 and R2, specifically addressing the closure under addition and scalar multiplication. It is clarified that the set of all integer vectors in R3 is not a subspace because it fails the scalar multiplication condition, as multiplying by a non-integer scalar results in vectors not in the set. Conversely, the set of vectors of the form (a,0) in R2 is confirmed as a subspace since it is closed under both addition and scalar multiplication, including negative scalars. Additionally, the importance of verifying that a set contains the zero vector is emphasized, as even a set that meets the first two conditions can still be the empty set, which does not qualify as a subspace. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the need for clarity on the empty set's role in subspace discussions.
Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So for a subspace 2 criteria have to be met:

its closed under addition, and scalar multiplication.

Now I have the question

"Which of the following subsets of R3 are subspaces? The set of all vectors of the form (a,b,c) where a,b, and c are:

integers"

This subset is closed under addition, but if I multiply by a scalar, I get (ka,kb,kc), which seems like it is closed under scalar multiplication, but if that scalar is negative wouldn't I get: (-ka, -kb, -kc)? which means its actually not closed..

But then I have another question that says

"Consider the sets of vectors of the following form. Determine whether the sets are subspaces of R2 or R3. :"

(a,0)

Again passes addition, but I don't understand why it passes scalar multiplication as well?

if I multiply it by k, I get (ka,0)

which is of the same form as (a,0)

but if k is a negative scalar, wouldn't I get (-ka, 0), which means its not a subspace?

but my book is telling me that it is indeed a subspace.

Does anyone know what I'm missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so for (a,0), maybe its because both (ka,0) and (-ka,0) are in R2? Because R2 isn't only limited to the positive axis?

If that's the reason, then why doesn't this imply to integers as well, since integers include both positive and negative whole numbers and zero..?
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
Ok, so for (a,0), maybe its because both (ka,0) and (-ka,0) are in R2? Because R2 isn't only limited to the positive axis?

If that's the reason, then why doesn't this imply to integers as well, since integers include both positive and negative whole numbers and zero..?

It helps to write down the sets in set builder notation

For the first question, you have to determine whether the set ##A := \{(a,b,c) \mid a,b,c \in \mathbb{Z} \}## is a subspace of ##\mathbb{R^3}##

As you noticed, this is not true. For example, take ##(1,0,0) \in A## and ##\sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{R}##. Then ##\sqrt{2}(1,0,0) = (\sqrt{2},0,0) \not\in A##. Hence, the set is not closed under scalar multiplication.

For the second question, you then have to determine whether the set ##B :=\{(a,0) \mid a \in \mathbb{R} \}## is a subspace of ##\mathbb{R^2}##

You already showed it is closed under addition. Now, pick any scalar ##k \in \mathbb{R}##, then ##k(a,0) = (\underbrace{ka}_{\in \mathbb{R}},0) \in B##

One last thing: there is another thing you have to verify when you have to check whether a set is a subspace. You must verify whether the set is non empty, which is usually done by quicly observing that the zero vector is element of the set (or not)
 
I thought though that as long as the first two conditions are met (closure under addition and scalar multiplication) that the zero vector will be in the set each time?
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
I thought though that as long as the first two conditions are met (closure under addition and scalar multiplication) that the zero vector will be in the set each time?

Nope, take the empty set. It is closed under scalar multiplication and addition but it does not contain the zero vector. When one writes a set, you are a priori not sure whether this set is the empty set in disguise (usually seeing this is rather trivial though) or something else.
 
Math_QED said:
Nope, take the empty set. It is closed under scalar multiplication and addition but it does not contain the zero vector. When one writes a set, you are a priori not sure whether this set is the empty set in disguise (usually seeing this is rather trivial though) or something else.
That makes sense. I find it odd that we didn't touch upon the empty set at all during class. Thanks for spreading your knowledge!
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K