Understanding the Basics of Chemistry: Is Air a Solution? What About Gasoline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter msimard8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Air is classified as a solution due to its homogeneous mixture of gases, primarily oxygen and nitrogen. Gasoline, composed of hydrocarbons like octane, is debated as either a solution or a compound, but it is generally considered a mixture. The conversion from 126 mm³ to cm³ results in 0.126 cm³, achieved by recognizing that 1 cm³ equals 1000 mm³. The conversion involves cubing the linear conversion factor, where 1 mm³ equals 10^(-3) cm³. Overall, both air and gasoline are mixtures, with air being a uniform solution of gases.
msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Is the following a mixture, element, compound, solution (homogeneous)

a) air ---im guessing solution because there is many different molecules and its clear

b) gasoline ---i can't decide whether gas is a solution or compound. The gasoline is made up of hydrogen and carbon.


oh one more question...

when converting

126 mm^3 to _____cm^3 ...how do you do that. I haven't delt with squares and cubes before when converting. Is there a trick to it?. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air and gasoline are mixtures, air is a mixture of oxygen, nitrogen and other gases in trace quantities, gasoline is a mixture of Octane and other hydrocarbons.

as for the conversion, I think you'll get 0.126 as the answer. to do it yourself , you have the conversion factor 1cm=10mm, cube both sides and you'll get 1000 mm^3 = 1 cm^3 so 1 mm^3 = 10^(-3) cm^3, multiply both sides by 126 to get the answer.
 
I disagree with gasoline and air being mixtures. Here are a couple short definitions;

Mixture, a material that can be separated by physical means into two or more substances.

Solution, a mixture that is uniform in its properties throughout given samples.

If you have gas or air, they are all equally mixed and can't be separated by phsyical means.

But, I could be wrong because for some reason those always confused me. If I was answering it, that is what I would put.

If you cheat that last one and type it into google, you get the same answer as aalmighty did. :wink:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top