Understanding the Boundary of a Spinfoam and Spin Network in LQG Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter naima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
I read in wikipedia that the boundary of a spinfoam is a spin network.
Is it true?
How can we define what is the boundary of a finite connected spinfoam?
I have the same question for a spin network.
As in LQG boundaries are of paramount importance, I think that we have to define them.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could look at the book "Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory" There is a chapter on classical discretization of GR. You may want to look particularly at section 4.4 where they start with the simple case of 3-spatial dimensions and define the connection between bulk and boundary and establish notation. At the start of chapter 7 they talk about the generalization to 4D spacetime.

A draft version of the book is quoted as here http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/IntroductionLQG.pdf
 
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.4539
Holonomy Spin Foam Models: Boundary Hilbert spaces and Time Evolution Operators
Bianca Dittrich, Frank Hellmann, Wojciech Kaminski

The notion of a boundary is defined in section 3.1, and the spin network basis for the boundary Hilbert space is given in section 3.2.
 
As i understand it in a spin network a boundary is a minimal set of edges. a bondary js between two vertices
if there is no path between them which can avoid these edges. Is this correct?
 
naima said:
there
is a problem with the link
Try again, I think it is OK now.
It takes a couple of minutes to download the complete draft of the book (illustrations etc.) so it is not fast, but it does work.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top