Understanding the Chain Rule for Partial Derivatives in Multivariable Calculus

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
u^{*}(r^{*},\theta^{*},\phi^{*}) = \frac{a}{r^{*}}u(\frac{a^{2}}{r^{*}},\theta^{*},\phi^{*})

\frac{\partial u^{*}}{\partial r^{*}}= \frac{a}{r^{*}}u_{r^{*}} \left( \frac{a^{2}}{r^{*}},\theta^{*},\phi^{*}\right) \left( -\frac{a^{2}}{r^{2*}} \right) - \frac{a}{r^{*2}} u \left( \frac{a^{2}}{r^{*}},\theta^{*},\phi^{*}\right)

where u_{r^{*}} is the partial of u w.r.t r*

Did I do this right? Is there a better way of representing u_{r^{*}} \left( \frac{a^{2}}{r^{*}},\theta^{*},\phi^{*}\right)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Somefantastik said:
<br /> Did I do this right? Is there a better way of representing u_{r^{*}} \left( \frac{a^{2}}{r^{*}},\theta^{*},\phi^{*}\right)
<br /> <br /> Calculation is right but pedantically speaking you mean derivative of u with respect to its first argument which is a^2/r* not r*.<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t know what kind of notations mathematicians use for that, symbolic programs like Mathematica would denote it like Derivative[1,0,0]<u>.</u>
 
well I'm trying to crank out the laplacian in spherical to show it u* is harmonic. So I'm just trying to differentiate with respect to each component and sub it into the laplacian in spherical and HOPEFULLY get zero.
 
I still need help with this. Is there anybody out there who can help me?
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top