Understanding the Coefficient of Restitution in 2-D Inelastic Collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a two-dimensional inelastic collision between two equal mass spherical balls, where one ball is initially stationary. The primary ball moves horizontally before the collision, and the post-collision velocities of both balls are analyzed. The coefficient of restitution is explored in relation to the speeds and velocity components of both balls before and after the collision. It is clarified that the coefficient can be determined by examining the speeds along the normal of the collision axis. The user ultimately resolves their confusion by recognizing the correct approach to calculate the coefficient of restitution.
Sythalist
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This concerns a collision between two spherical balls of equal mass and radius. The collision is two dimensional and not completely elastic. The secondary ball begins stationary. The primary ball travels along the horizontal axis with a given velocity. After the collision, the speed and components of velocity of both balls are observed.

u0 = initial velocity of primary ball
v0 = initial velocity of secondary ball = 0

u1x = horizontal component of velocity of primary ball post collision
u1y = vertical component of velocity of primary ball post collision
|u1| = post collision speed of primary ball

v1x = horizontal component of velocity of secondary ball post collision
v1y = vertical component of velocity of secondary ball post collision
|v1| = post collision speed of secondary ball

The question is about the coefficient of restitution. What is, if any, the relationship between all or some of the above variables in terms of the coefficient of restitution? Or how can we determine the coefficient of restitution from the above variables? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaah n/m sorry, I just hit a mind block back there, I did more research and figured out you must use the speeds along the axis of the normal of the collision. And that the secondary ball's direction IS along the normal of collision axis. Then you simply find the ratio between the difference of speeds before and after the collision. oops

hehe talking to myself in my ooooown thread
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top