Coefficient of restitution in different frames of references

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the coefficient of restitution (ε) in collisions, specifically when analyzing two objects with masses m1=1 and m2=2, and initial velocities u1=3 and u2=-4. The coefficient of restitution is calculated as sqrt(0.9), indicating that 90% of kinetic energy (KE) is lost during the collision. The key issue identified is the discrepancy between the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the energy equations when not accounting for the residual kinetic energy in the lab frame of reference. The conservation of mass and momentum principles are crucial for accurate calculations in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the coefficient of restitution and its calculation
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Familiarity with frame of reference transformations in physics
  • Basic proficiency in solving equations involving kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the coefficient of restitution in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about frame of reference transformations in classical mechanics
  • Explore the concept of residual kinetic energy in collision scenarios
  • Investigate advanced collision equations and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and professionals interested in collision dynamics, particularly those focusing on energy conservation and frame of reference analysis in mechanical systems.

Roman.G
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To simplify my question I would like to use a random example (although, the issue holds regardless of the numbers you pick). Suppose two objects collide (head-on) in one dimension. The initial parameters are as follows (units are irrelevant):

m1=1;m2=2;u1=3;u2=-4;

Also, suppose that exactly 90% of the KE is lost as a result of the collision (hence, the coefficient of restitution is sqrt(0.9)). Now I can convert both velocities into the center-of-mass frame of reference, invert them, multiply by sqrt(0.9) and convert back into the lab frame of reference to get (one of the two solutions):

v1=-6.09384 and v2=-0.54692

The problem with these numbers is: if I keep everything in the lab frame of reference and plug all these numbers into these equations (where ε=0.9):

Untitled.png


their LHS is not equal to their RHS by quite a significant quantity.

What am I missing?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roman.G said:
their LHS is not equal to their RHS by quite a significant quantity.

What am I missing?
If the objects have a non-zero total momentum in the lab frame then the system as a whole will have residual kinetic energy based on total mass and velocity of the center of mass, even when the component objects have all come to rest with respect to each other. As long as mass and momentum are conserved, this kinetic energy cannot go away. The coefficient of restitution can be thought of as the fraction of kinetic energy retained during each collision above and beyond that residual amount which is always retained.

If you included that residual energy when multiplying by 0.9 then your calculations would result in an energy deficit of 0.1 times residual energy, compared with reality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
107K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K