Understanding the Contact Rate in SIS Epidemic Modelling

  • Thread starter Thread starter rickywaldron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modelling
rickywaldron
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For the probability of the number of infective's increasing in one time step, I found the answer is:
∆tβi(N-i)/N
where β is the contact rate, ∆t is the time step, i is number of infectives,N is total number of susceptible's and infective's

I can't quite see where this is coming from. β is the contact rate, so it makes sense to multiply by i since for more i, more chances of encounters. Then multiplying by N-i makes sense since more susceptible also means more chance of encounters.

But then why the division by N? I think my problem may be in understanding what the "contact rate" actually means
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rickywaldron said:
But then why the division by N? I think my problem may be in understanding what the "contact rate" actually means
I think it actually has to do with understanding what a probability is. :-p

What is a probability? What does it tell you?

Answering those questions should tell you the answer to your question.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top