Understanding the Conversion of Energy Forms in Particle Interactions

In summary, annihilation events between matter and antimatter pairs are only possible because of the unique properties of leptons and antileptons, which are states of the same underlying quantum field. This process is not observed between any two massive particles, as it would violate several conservation laws. To learn more about quantum field theory and this topic, recommended resources include "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" by A. Zee and "Quantum Field Theory for the Gifted Amateur" by T. Lancaster and S. Blundell.
  • #1
TheCanadian
367
13
Different forces (e.g. electromagnetism, colour) are mediated via different force-carrying particles (e.g. photon, gluon). When converting from one form of energy to another, what force-carrying particles are involved in converting acceleration (or more generally a change in kinetic energy) of charged particles into electromagnetic radiation as observed in bremsstrahlung emission?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TheCanadian said:
When converting from one form of energy to another, what force-carrying particles are involved in converting acceleration (or more generally a change in kinetic energy) of charged particles into electromagnetic radiation as observed in bremsstrahlung emission?

None. Charged particles interact directly with photons (EM radiation).
 
  • #3
PeterDonis said:
None. Charged particles interact directly with photons (EM radiation).

Ahh yes, here's a different example although perhaps more in line with my original question:

When discussing matter-antimatter pairs, the energy released by the annihilation event is proportional to the mass. But what permits this between antimatter-matter pairs? Why is this not ordinarily observed for any two massive particles (e.g. an electron and another electron)? Is there a force carrier associated with annihilation events and a field where this energy is stored before the annihilation/releasing a photon (or other possible products depending on the total mass/energy)?
 
  • #4
TheCanadian said:
Why is this not ordinarily observed for any two massive particles (e.g. an electron and another electron)?
That interaction would violate several conservation laws, including charge and lepton number.

A particle/antiparticle interaction is pretty much the only annihilation that is guaranteed not to violate any conservation laws.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #5
Nugatory said:
That interaction would violate several conservation laws, including charge and lepton number.

A particle/antiparticle interaction is pretty much the only annihilation that is guaranteed not to violate any conservation laws.

Fair enough, and that's very cool. I suppose the concept is still a bit unformed in my head. Maybe more examples will help:

If one could hypothetically construct a particle that has all of the same properties as a positron (e.g. charge, lepton number) except for mass, would it still be able to annihilate with an electron? Is gravity/gravitons predicted to influence annihilation in current theoretical frameworks?
 
  • #6
TheCanadian said:
If one could hypothetically construct a particle that has all of the same properties as a positron (e.g. charge, lepton number) except for mass, would it still be able to annihilate with an electron?

This is not a hypothetical; it's actually realizable, and the answer is no. There are three "families" of leptons in the Standard Model: the electron family, the muon family, and the tau family. (Each family contains a charged lepton and its antiparticle, and an uncharged lepton and its antiparticle; in the electron family these are the electron/positron and the electron neutrino/antineutrino.) Each lepton can only annihilate with its own antiparticle, the one in the same family and with opposite charge. The neutrinos (electron, muon, and tau, each with its own antiparticle) are particularly interesting in this regard, since they have no conserved charges other than lepton number.

The underlying reason for all this is that, in quantum field theory, particles and antiparticles are not just two separate things that happen to be opposites in all conserved charges. They are states of the same underlying quantum field. (The technical term is that they are CPT conjugates of each other.) The process we have been describing as "annihilation", from the viewpoint of QFT, is just a difference in the state of the quantum field between one region of spacetime and another.
 
  • #7
PeterDonis said:
This is not a hypothetical; it's actually realizable, and the answer is no. There are three "families" of leptons in the Standard Model: the electron family, the muon family, and the tau family. (Each family contains a charged lepton and its antiparticle, and an uncharged lepton and its antiparticle; in the electron family these are the electron/positron and the electron neutrino/antineutrino.) Each lepton can only annihilate with its own antiparticle, the one in the same family and with opposite charge. The neutrinos (electron, muon, and tau, each with its own antiparticle) are particularly interesting in this regard, since they have no conserved charges other than lepton number.

The underlying reason for all this is that, in quantum field theory, particles and antiparticles are not just two separate things that happen to be opposites in all conserved charges. They are states of the same underlying quantum field. (The technical term is that they are CPT conjugates of each other.) The process we have been describing as "annihilation", from the viewpoint of QFT, is just a difference in the state of the quantum field between one region of spacetime and another.

Well that's fascinating. It seems like fairly standard QFT, but do you have any particular resources/texts you would suggest for this topic (and perhaps QFT more generally)?
 
  • #8
TheCanadian said:
Well that's fascinating. It seems like fairly standard QFT, but do you have any particular resources/texts you would suggest for this topic (and perhaps QFT more generally)?

First what's your level of standard QM?

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • #9
bhobba said:
First what's your level of stnadard QM?

Thanks
Bill

I've taken standard QMI and QMII and a graduate QM course for selected topics (e.g. entanglement, identical particles, classical to quantized EM fields, perturbation techniques), but haven't yet studied group theory, Feynman diagrams, or delved into QCD.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
That's good enough - here are the two books I would recommend to start with:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0984513957/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/019969933X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then - Schwartz:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1107034736/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then THE book on QFT that IMHO is simply the best - Weinberg:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521670535/?tag=pfamazon01-20

QFT is one of those areas you should build up to and not tackle the best ie Weinberg - straight away. Take your time - its not a race.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes TheCanadian

Related to Understanding the Conversion of Energy Forms in Particle Interactions

1. What is "change in the form of energy"?

"Change in the form of energy" refers to the transformation of energy from one form to another. This can occur through processes such as chemical reactions, mechanical work, or heat transfer.

2. Why does energy change form?

Energy changes form in order to maintain a balance in the universe. The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another.

3. How is energy converted from one form to another?

Energy can be converted from one form to another through various processes, such as heat transfer, electrical work, or nuclear reactions. For example, when a light bulb is turned on, electrical energy is converted into light and heat energy.

4. What are the different forms of energy?

There are many different forms of energy, including kinetic energy (energy of motion), potential energy (stored energy), thermal energy (heat), chemical energy (stored in bonds between atoms), and electromagnetic energy (light and radiation).

5. How does "change in the form of energy" impact our daily lives?

"Change in the form of energy" impacts our daily lives in numerous ways. For example, we use electrical energy to power our homes and devices, chemical energy in the food we eat for fuel, and thermal energy to keep us warm. Understanding energy and its transformations is crucial for our daily activities and the functioning of our society.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
777
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
871
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
900
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
742
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
979
Back
Top