Understanding the D^{l}(\theta) Representation of 3D Rotations

Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
I'm having difficulty with the D^{l}(\theta) representation of 3D rotations what do the mean i suppose one you construct it for l = 1 you get the general rotation Euler matrix for 3-d Space, but what do the l = other integers or half integers mean physically? is the D matrices the generalization of 3-D rotations to different vector spaces? such as a 2 dimensional space for l = 1/2? any explanation would help thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phymath said:
I'm having difficulty with the D^{l}(\theta) representation of 3D rotations what do the mean i suppose one you construct it for l = 1 you get the general rotation Euler matrix for 3-d Space, but what do the l = other integers or half integers mean physically? is the D matrices the generalization of 3-D rotations to different vector spaces? such as a 2 dimensional space for l = 1/2? any explanation would help thanks.
Hmm...roughly speaking, in QM, the description of spin is by the the representation of the group SU(2), which is locally isomorphic to the group SO(3), they can share similar representations.
To obtain the representations of group SU(2), we can start from the algebra, i.e. [J_i,J_j]=i\epsilon_{ijk}J_k, where J_i are generators. By the standard procedure which is shown by almost all QM book(e.g. Sakurai), you can see that the representations are labeled by an integer or half integer j, or your l. For the case of j = 1, you could actually think of it as the three dimensional vector representation. For the case of j = 1/2, this is a representation of the intrinsic spin of, say, electrons. For the group SO(3), it turns out that j could be only integers, 0,1,2,...
Representations can be direct product to form a larger representation, this is physically interpreted as the addition of spins.
Any supplement or corrections are welcome.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top