Understanding the Derivation of Energy in Dielectric Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of energy in dielectric systems as presented in Griffiths' textbook, specifically regarding the operation involving the symbol \(\bigtriangleup\). Participants clarify that \(\bigtriangleup\) represents an infinitesimal variation rather than the Laplace operator, and its use is valid only when permittivity \(\epsilon\) is constant throughout space. The equation \(\Delta({\bf E\cdot D})=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D\) is discussed, emphasizing that the term vanishes under certain conditions. Additionally, there is confusion about the significance of a 1/2 term, which some participants note disappears in the context of the derivation. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the mathematical operations involved in the energy derivation in dielectrics.
almarpa
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
Hello all.

I have a doubt about the derivation of energy in dielectrics formula (Griffiths pages 191 - 192).

In a certain step of the formula derivation, we encounter the following operation:

(view formula below).

I do not undertand that operation.

Can someone help me?
Dibujo.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What means the \bigtriangleup? It looks like it only works on the first term of D·E.
 
USeptim said:
What means the \bigtriangleup? It looks like it only works on the first term of D·E.
Laplace operator
 
  • Like
Likes USeptim
Thanks zoki85, I used to see for the Laplacian \bigtriangledown^2.

Almarpa. The link you have set it's a bit out of context. It only shows that you can conmute the lapace operator and the dot product since D and E differ only by a constant \epsilon.
 
2(E.E)=▽2E.E+E.▽2E

you can think the ▽2 as a scalar, but it also is a differential operator like d/dx
 
It is not the laplacian operator. It represents an incremental variation of the quantity this symbol goes with.
 
Last edited:
It is not the laplace operator. It is just an increment.
 
athosanian said:
2(E.E)=▽2E.E+E.▽2E
you can think the ▽2 as a scalar, but it also is a differential operator like d/dx
##\nabla^2({\bf E\cdot E})## is not that simple.
 
##\Delta## is just an infinitesimal variation. That step is only valid if ##\epsilon##
does not vary with position anywhere in space. Then the step just says
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}##.
 
  • #10
Meir Achuz said:
##\Delta## is just an infinitesimal variation. That step is only valid if ##\epsilon##
does not vary with position anywhere in space. Then the step just says
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}##.
If so, he should wrote it d , not Δ
 
  • #11
##\Delta## is commonly used, with the limit ##d=lim\Delta\rightarrow 0##.
 
  • #12
Sorry, but I still do not get it.

What happens with the 1/2 term? It vanishes, but I can not see why.
 
  • #13
almarpa said:
Sorry, but I still do not get it.
What happens with the 1/2 term? It vanishes, but I can not see why.
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}=2\epsilon{\bf E\cdot E}##
if ##\epsilon## is constant.
 
Back
Top