Understanding the Derivation of Energy in Dielectric Systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of energy in dielectric systems, specifically focusing on a formula presented in Griffiths' text. Participants express confusion regarding certain operations within the derivation, particularly the meaning and application of the symbol \(\Delta\) in the context of the electric displacement field \(D\) and the electric field \(E\).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the operation involving \(\Delta\) in the formula derivation, seeking clarification on its meaning.
  • Another participant suggests that \(\Delta\) may only apply to the first term of \(D \cdot E\), indicating a potential misunderstanding.
  • Several participants discuss the nature of the Laplacian operator, with some asserting that \(\Delta\) represents an incremental variation rather than the Laplacian.
  • There is a claim that the step involving \(\Delta\) is valid only if \(\epsilon\) does not vary with position, leading to a specific expression involving \(E\) and \(D\).
  • One participant expresses confusion about the disappearance of a \(1/2\) term in the derivation, indicating that they do not understand why it vanishes.
  • Another participant reiterates the relationship between \(\Delta\) and infinitesimal variations, suggesting that it is commonly used in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of \(\Delta\) or the treatment of the \(1/2\) term, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding these aspects of the derivation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the constancy of \(\epsilon\) and the implications of using \(\Delta\) versus \(d\) in the derivation process.

almarpa
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
Hello all.

I have a doubt about the derivation of energy in dielectrics formula (Griffiths pages 191 - 192).

In a certain step of the formula derivation, we encounter the following operation:

(view formula below).

I do not undertand that operation.

Can someone help me?
Dibujo.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What means the [itex]\bigtriangleup[/itex]? It looks like it only works on the first term of D·E.
 
USeptim said:
What means the [itex]\bigtriangleup[/itex]? It looks like it only works on the first term of D·E.
Laplace operator
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: USeptim
Thanks zoki85, I used to see for the Laplacian [itex]\bigtriangledown^2[/itex].

Almarpa. The link you have set it's a bit out of context. It only shows that you can conmute the lapace operator and the dot product since D and E differ only by a constant [itex]\epsilon[/itex].
 
2(E.E)=▽2E.E+E.▽2E

you can think the ▽2 as a scalar, but it also is a differential operator like d/dx
 
It is not the laplacian operator. It represents an incremental variation of the quantity this symbol goes with.
 
Last edited:
It is not the laplace operator. It is just an increment.
 
athosanian said:
2(E.E)=▽2E.E+E.▽2E
you can think the ▽2 as a scalar, but it also is a differential operator like d/dx
##\nabla^2({\bf E\cdot E})## is not that simple.
 
##\Delta## is just an infinitesimal variation. That step is only valid if ##\epsilon##
does not vary with position anywhere in space. Then the step just says
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}##.
 
  • #10
Meir Achuz said:
##\Delta## is just an infinitesimal variation. That step is only valid if ##\epsilon##
does not vary with position anywhere in space. Then the step just says
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}##.
If so, he should wrote it d , not Δ
 
  • #11
##\Delta## is commonly used, with the limit ##d=lim\Delta\rightarrow 0##.
 
  • #12
Sorry, but I still do not get it.

What happens with the 1/2 term? It vanishes, but I can not see why.
 
  • #13
almarpa said:
Sorry, but I still do not get it.
What happens with the 1/2 term? It vanishes, but I can not see why.
##\Delta({\bf E\cdot D)=E\cdot(\Delta D)+(\Delta E)\cdot D}=2\epsilon{\bf E\cdot E}##
if ##\epsilon## is constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
978
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K