Understanding the Difference Between B and E Fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter manjuvenamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Fields
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the terminology surrounding magnetic field strength, specifically why B is referred to as "magnetic induction" rather than "magnetic field strength" like E. This distinction arose from historical differences between physicists and engineers, with engineers focusing on magnetic flux and introducing the term "magnetic flux density" for B. The term "magnetic induction" was adopted to avoid confusion with E, despite both being components of the same tensor in advanced electromagnetic theory. Additionally, while B is influenced by material properties, H is considered a better descriptor of magnetic field strength. The conversation highlights the complexities and nuances in defining these electromagnetic concepts.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Why don't we call B magnetic field strength like we call E, the electrical counterpart. In stead we call it magnetic induction which is less descriptive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is due to the intenational conferences the "named" physical quantities and invented SI. Unfortunately, there was a split in the '50s between physicists and (mostly industrial) engineers. The engineers were most interested in magnetic flux, which powered their generators. They invented the Weber of flux and called B "magnetic flux density" in units of Weber per square meter. That name was unwieldy, even for them, so someone suggested the strange term "magnetic induction". The engineers were careful not to give B the same name as E, so as not to confuse the two. Physicists know it is no confusion, after Maxwell and Einstein, that E and B are just different components of the same tensor. Several advancedl EM texts call B the magnetic field as you and I suggest.
These books also use the same unit, gauss, for B and E, in gaussian units.
 
The problem is that, as soon as you look at material properties, B is not a good descriptor of magnetic field strength, which is better described by H.
 
manjuvenamma said:
Why don't we call B magnetic field strength like we call E, the electrical counterpart. In stead we call it magnetic induction which is less descriptive.

I'm not sure what you mean by "counterpart"? "E" has units of volts/meter, and is the electric field intensity. "H" has units of amps/meter and is called magnetic field intensity. It appears that E and H are "counterparts". Also, at a boundary of 2 different materials, the "normal" (perpendicular) components of "B" in both materials, and that of "D" in both are equal. But, the tangential components of "E" are equal for both materials, as well as that of "H".

It is obvious that "B" is the counterpart of "D", the electric flux density, aka "electric displacement", whereas "H" is the counterpart of "E".

I hope this helps. BR.
 
Last edited:
see B is magnetic induction which gives effect of magnetic field H .they both look like same macroscopicaly but on a smaller scale there is a huge diff. b/w them just like there is b/w E and D.
B will also depend on the medium while H does not.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
577
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K