Understanding the Difference Between Bending Stress and Normal Stress in Beams

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending
[/B]
form the link, we know that σ represent the bending stress, I'm wondering can I call the bending stress as normal stress act at the cross sectional area of beam?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO, they are not the same...Because the normal stress act on the cross sectional of beam will only cause the beam to elongate or shorten, it will not cause it to bend , so they are not the same...
 

Attachments

  • 350.PNG
    350.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 515
on Phys.org
chetzread said:

Homework Statement



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending
[/B]
form the link, we know that σ represent the bending stress, I'm wondering can I call the bending stress as normal stress act at the cross sectional area of beam?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO, they are not the same...Because the normal stress act on the cross sectional of beam will only cause the beam to elongate or shorten, it will not cause it to bend , so they are not the same...
If there is tensile stress perpendicular to the beam cross sections in the upper half of the beam, and compressive stress in the bottom half of the beam, the upper half of the beam will get longer and the bottom half of the beam will get shorter. This geometrically means that the beam is bent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
Chestermiller said:
If there is tensile stress perpendicular to the beam cross sections in the upper half of the beam, and compressive stress in the bottom half of the beam, the upper half of the beam will get longer and the bottom half of the beam will get shorter. This geometrically means that the beam is bent.
I agreed, but, it only means the beam is sheared , but not bent like U shape, right?
 
chetzread said:
I agreed, but, it only means the beam is sheared , but not bent like U shape, right?
why you said that it's bent?
 
chetzread said:
why you said that it's bent?
The key assumption involved here is the flat cross sections of the beam remain flat after the deformation has occurred. Can you tell me how the cross sections can remain flat while the upper part of the beam gets longer and the bottom part of the beam gets shorter without the beam developing curvature (i.e., bending)?

Your reference fails to mention this key assumption (that is actually observed in practice). Therefore, I can see the source of your confusion regarding the deformation being shear. "Shear bending" does actually occur in very short beams, but in long slender beams, the dominant mode of deformation is "normal bending".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
Chestermiller said:
The key assumption involved here is the flat cross sections of the beam remain flat after the deformation has occurred. Can you tell me how the cross sections can remain flat while the upper part of the beam gets longer and the bottom part of the beam gets shorter without the beam developing curvature (i.e., bending)?
initially, i was thinking that the author mean this, so the object is sheared , but not bent (figure above)
But, it should look like this,right? (figure below)
 

Attachments

  • 353.png
    353.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 559