Understanding the Geometric Series Formula: Solving for a Complex Variable

  • Thread starter Thread starter N468989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Signals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the geometric series formula for a complex variable, specifically the expression for the sum of a geometric series. Participants suggest that the case where α=1 is straightforward, while the case for any complex α ≠ 1 can be demonstrated through manipulation of the summation and simplification. Recommendations for study materials include precalculus or calculus textbooks, with a mention of mathematical induction as a relevant concept. The final resolution involves recognizing the relationship between the summation and the expression, leading to a clearer understanding of the formula. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of foundational concepts in mathematics for grasping the geometric series.
N468989
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
hi everyone,

i had a class where my teacher was talking about this but i don't know where this comes from, if anyone knows could you please give hint on the type of material this is. Like what type of mathbook i should be looking for.


the problem was:

Demonstrate the following expression:


\[\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{l l}<br /> N &amp; \quad \mbox{, $\alpha$ = 1}\\<br /> \frac{1-\alpha^N}{1-\alpha} &amp; \quad \mbox{, for any complex, $\alpha$ $\neq$ 1}\\ \end{array} \right. \]

thankyou very much for any help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
tko_gx said:
Demonstrate the following expression:


\[\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{l l}<br /> N &amp; \quad \mbox{, $\alpha$ = 1}\\<br /> \frac{1-\alpha^N}{1-\alpha} &amp; \quad \mbox{, for any complex, $\alpha$ $\neq$ 1}\\ \end{array} \right. \]

thankyou very much for any help.

Well, the case where \alpha=1 should be easy enough. To demonstrate the second case, simply multiply the summation by the fraction \frac{1-\alpha}{1-\alpha}. This will give you the denominator you need, and some subsequent simplifications to the numerator give you the final answer.
 
tko_gx said:
hi everyone,

i had a class where my teacher was talking about this but i don't know where this comes from, if anyone knows could you please give hint on the type of material this is. Like what type of mathbook i should be looking for.


the problem was:

Demonstrate the following expression:


\[\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{l l}<br /> N &amp; \quad \mbox{, $\alpha$ = 1}\\<br /> \frac{1-\alpha^N}{1-\alpha} &amp; \quad \mbox{, for any complex, $\alpha$ $\neq$ 1}\\ \end{array} \right. \]

thankyou very much for any help.

Precalculus or calculus text.

CS
 
tko_gx said:
Demonstrate the following expression:


\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \frac{1-\alpha^N}{1-\alpha}

thank you very much for any help.

quadraphonics said:
Well, the case where \alpha=1 should be easy enough. To demonstrate the second case, simply multiply the summation by the fraction \frac{1-\alpha}{1-\alpha}. This will give you the denominator you need, and some subsequent simplifications to the numerator give you the final answer.

in other words, ask yourself why the following is true:

(1-\alpha)\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n - \alpha\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = 1 - \alpha^N

if you can figger out why that is true, you've solved your problem.
 
thanks for the help i found it in a calculus book. it´s mathematical induction.

rbj said:
in other words, ask yourself why the following is true:

(1-\alpha)\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n - \alpha\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha^n = 1 - \alpha^N

if you can figger out why that is true, you've solved your problem.

i can use the homogeneous property...and thus get the anwser

anyway thankyou all for helping out.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top