Understanding the Graphical Method of Multiplication

  • Thread starter Thread starter gabrown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiplication
gabrown
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have just watched a very interesting way of multiplying 2 numbers together, but i wonder if anyone could explain to me why it works.

here is the link

Calculating technique - 5min - Video


cheers

gabrown
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gabrown said:
I have just watched a very interesting way of multiplying 2 numbers together, but i wonder if anyone could explain to me why it works.

here is the link

Calculating technique - 5min - Video

If you examine what the method is doing, it is multiplying each digit independently and then summing up the ones, the tens, and the hundreds place.

It is the same process as long multiplication, just graphically instead of numerically. Seriously, do the problem side by side and you will see exactly the same numbers at each step.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top