Understanding the Identity Operator in 2-Qubit Quantum Systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unitary transformation \mathbf{U}_f in 2-qubit quantum systems, specifically how it operates on input and output registers. It is clarified that \left| x\right>\left| y\right> represents a tensor product of the two qubits. The transformation \mathbf{U}_f is shown to equal the identity operator \mathbf{1} when the function f outputs zero for both inputs, indicating no change in the state. The conversation suggests that further inquiries into this topic may be more appropriate in a quantum mechanics forum. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of quantum computing.
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Suppose \mathbf{U}_f(\left| x\right>\left| y\right> )=\left| x\right>\left| y\oplus f(x)\right> denotes the unitary transformation corresponding to some 1-bit function f.

I'm guessing here that x is the input register, and y the output register.

Now suppose f(0)=0 and f(1)=0.

How is it that \mathbf{U}_f=\mathbf{1} the 2-Qbit unit operator?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general, is \left| x\right>\left| y\right> a tensor product?
 
don't know about your first question but in general \left| x\right>\left| y\right>
means tensor product, we are just too lazy to write it.
 
It might be better to post this under "quantum mechanics".
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top