Understanding the Laws of Thermodynamics as described by Feynman

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the complexities of understanding the Laws of Thermodynamics as presented in Richard Feynman's lectures. Participants express confusion regarding Feynman's assumptions about an ideal engine, particularly the concept of "magical heat pads" at temperatures T1 and T2, and the implications of heat transfer without temperature change. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the reservoir's high thermal inertia and the distinction between work done by external forces versus internal gas pressure during compression. Recommendations for alternative resources, such as "Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics" by Moran et al., are provided for clearer comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with concepts of heat transfer and thermal equilibrium
  • Knowledge of ideal gas behavior and properties
  • Basic calculus for understanding work done in thermodynamic processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of thermal inertia and its implications in thermodynamic systems
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of work done in thermodynamic processes, specifically W = ∫ p dV
  • Explore alternative thermodynamics textbooks, particularly "Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics" by Moran et al.
  • Investigate the differences between reversible and irreversible processes in thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of thermodynamics, educators seeking to clarify complex concepts, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of energy transfer and work in thermodynamic systems.

bryanso
Messages
28
Reaction score
7
Hi, there is no other topics in my adventure in Feynman Lectures that makes me so loss in thoughts (https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_44.html). I seem to understand every sentence. But the whole thing is completely unintelligible. Let me start by asking one fundamental question. I am sure after that I would have a lot more. Thanks for support.

This question is about "magical assumptions". So Mr. Feynman assumes we have an ideal engine with no friction, I'm fine with that. Now he assumes there are two magical "heat pads" at temperature T1 and T2.

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/img/FLP_I/f44-06/f44-06_tc_big.svgz

At point (c) he wrote,

The gas cylinder has now reached the temperature T2, so that if we put it on the heat pad at temperature T2 there will be no irreversible changes. Now we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2, following the curve marked (3) (Fig. 44–5, Step 3). Because the cylinder is in contact with the reservoir, the temperature does not rise, but heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at the temperature T2.
  • Everything else is assumed to be ideal... I would think if heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at temperature T2 then obviously the reservoir's temperature would start to increase too? Why can he make such an assumption that it doesn't?
  • It seems like he's making assumptions here and there that just happen to work with his argument, quite arbitrarily.
  • He said "we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2". But later on, all the calculation seems to ignore there are "external work"... done by "we". Why is that left out?
Sorry I'm really very confused. May be another introductory text is necessary... Please advise.
 
Science news on Phys.org
bryanso said:
Summary:: Completely loss -- Laws of Thermodynamics in Feynman Lectures

Hi, there is no other topics in my adventure in Feynman Lectures that makes me so loss in thoughts (https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_44.html). I seem to understand every sentence. But the whole thing is completely unintelligible. Let me start by asking one fundamental question. I am sure after that I would have a lot more. Thanks for support.

This question is about "magical assumptions". So Mr. Feynman assumes we have an ideal engine with no friction, I'm fine with that. Now he assumes there are two magical "heat pads" at temperature T1 and T2.

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/img/FLP_I/f44-06/f44-06_tc_big.svgz

At point (c) he wrote,

The gas cylinder has now reached the temperature T2, so that if we put it on the heat pad at temperature T2 there will be no irreversible changes. Now we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2, following the curve marked (3) (Fig. 44–5, Step 3). Because the cylinder is in contact with the reservoir, the temperature does not rise, but heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at the temperature T2.
  • Everything else is assumed to be ideal... I would think if heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at temperature T2 then obviously the reservoir's temperature would start to increase too? Why can he make such an assumption that it doesn't?
The reservoir is assumed to have a very high thermal inertia (mass times heat capacity) so that its temperature increase is negligible.
  • He said "we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2". But later on, all the calculation seems to ignore there are "external work"... done by "we". Why is that left out?
I don't understand this question. Can you please re-word?
 
Thanks.

The second question is about the definition of Work done by this engine.

When I read that "The gas cylinder has now reached the temperature T2, so that if we put it on the heat pad at temperature T2 there will be no irreversible changes. Now we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2, following the curve marked (3) (Fig. 44–5, Step 3). Because the cylinder is in contact with the reservoir, the temperature does not rise, but heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at the temperature T2."

To me it means:

Someone (a person's hand pressing it) presses the cylinder for some time, very slowly so nothing vigorous occurs. Q2 transfers from the cylinder to that reservoir.

Later Feynman states "Incidentally, it is easy to find out what the total amount of work is, because the work during any expansion is the pressure times the change in volume"

## W = \int p\, dV ##

Is that all? Shouldn't we add to the above the work done by my hand when I press the cylinder?
 
bryanso said:
Thanks.

The second question is about the definition of Work done by this engine.

When I read that "The gas cylinder has now reached the temperature T2, so that if we put it on the heat pad at temperature T2 there will be no irreversible changes. Now we slowly compress the gas while it is in contact with the reservoir at T2, following the curve marked (3) (Fig. 44–5, Step 3). Because the cylinder is in contact with the reservoir, the temperature does not rise, but heat Q2 flows from the cylinder into the reservoir at the temperature T2."

To me it means:

Someone (a person's hand pressing it) presses the cylinder for some time, very slowly so nothing vigorous occurs. Q2 transfers from the cylinder to that reservoir.
This is correct.
Later Feynman states "Incidentally, it is easy to find out what the total amount of work is, because the work during any expansion is the pressure times the change in volume"

## W = \int p\, dV ##

Is that all? Shouldn't we add to the above the work done by my hand when I press the cylinder?
First of all, the equation should have a minus sign (if this is the work done on the gas).

Secondly, your hand is doing work on the (massless, frictionless) piston, and the piston is doing an equal amount of work on the gas. So no net work is done on the piston, but work is done on the gas. This equation is just the force integrated over the displacement: Fds=PdV

If you really want to understand thermo, I do not recommend studying it from Feynman. I recommend Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics by Moran et al. This is a wonderful book that is worth adding to your collection, but it is also available for download online.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thanks for the recommendation. I was just trying to complete all his lectures due to "completionism". I do sense it's too terse as a formal overview of this topic. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K