Understanding the Levi-Civita Symbol and Commutators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutators
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Sorry for spamming the forums, but one last question for today!

If

\Sigma^k=\frac{i}{2} \epsilon_{kij} [\gamma^i , \gamma^j]

where [A,B]=AB-BA

Why does {\Sigma^1=2i \gamma^2\gamma^3 (that's what my notes say, anyway)

I think it should equal:

\Sigma^1=\frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{123}[\gamma^2,\gamma^3] + \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{132}[\gamma^3,\gamma^2]
= \frac{i}{2}(+1)}[\gamma^2,\gamma^3] + \frac{i}{2}(-1)(-[\gamma^2,\gamma^3])
=i[\gamma^2,\gamma^3]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disregard that question - I've just worked it out. For anyone who's interested: it's because

<br /> =\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu = -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu <br />
 
vertices said:
Disregard that question - I've just worked it out. For anyone who's interested: it's because

<br /> =\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu = -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu <br />
that is not true, it is only true for the "spatial" components, for the time component: gamma^0 gamma^0 = gamma^0 gamma^0 = 1
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top