Understanding the Mass and Density of Empty Aluminum Cans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bcisewski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Mass
AI Thread Summary
The mass of a pile of empty aluminum cans cannot be calculated using the formula m = ρV with the density of aluminum because the cans are not solid; they contain air. While the density of aluminum is 2700 kg/m3, the average density of the pile is significantly lower due to the air-filled space within the cans. This means that the actual mass of the pile will be much less than 2700 kg for a volume of 1.0 m3. Understanding that the volume includes both the cans and the air is crucial for accurate mass calculations. Therefore, the presence of air within the cans must be taken into account when determining the overall density and mass.
Bcisewski
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Please correct me if wrong, but to explain why the mass of the pile is not pV = (2700 kg/m3)(1.0 m3) = 2700 kg, is because a pile of empty cans, its volume would be more of a dimension vs a weight. please explain concept if someone can. Thank you

Question: A pile of empty aluminum cans has a volume of 1.0 m3. The density of aluminum is 2700 kg/m3. Explain why the mass of the pile is not "p(alumin)*V "= (2700 kg/m3)(1.0 m3) = 2700 kg. Used from the formula p=m/V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of some volume of stuff is m = \rho V, where \rho is the density of whatever stuff fills the volume. Only if it were solid aluminum, would \rho equal the density of aluminum. An empty can is mostly air, so the average density is much less than that of pure aluminum.
 
Thanks for the assistance, I overlooked the cans as having space within. I guess sometime the obvious to some may be difficult to see for others.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top