Understanding the math in the Michelson-Morley experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter aj_17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the mathematics behind the Michelson-Morley experiment, particularly through a swimmer analogy to explain vector velocities. It highlights the importance of distinguishing between velocity and speed, emphasizing that the swimmer must account for the river's current to swim directly across. The correct approach involves representing both the swimmer's and the river's velocities as vectors with components in relation to the water flow. Participants are encouraged to show their work to receive targeted assistance. Clarity in the problem's phrasing is noted as a potential source of confusion.
aj_17
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
[Mentors' note - No template because this post was moved from the Relativity forum]
Summary:: I'm trying to make sense of the trig/algebra in discussing the experiment. This is an excerpt from the textbook Modern Physics (Thornton/Rex) meant to further explain the set up, however I'm not following. Could someone explain this?

If a swimmer (who can swim with speed v2 in still water) wants to swim across a swiftly moving river (speed v1), the swimmer must start heading upriver, so that when the current carries her downstream, she will move directly across the river. Careful reasoning shows that the swimmer’s velocity is sqrt(v2^2-v1^2) throughout her journey (Problem 4).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is a bit carelessly phrased because it's not respecting the distinction between velocity which is a vector, and speed, which is the magnitude of that vector, and because it's not being clear about which velocities are relative to what.

But with said, you'll be able to get through this problem if you write both the velocity of the water relative to the bank and the velocity of the swimmer relative to the water as vectors with components parallel to and perpendicular to the direction of the water flow. The swimmer's velocity relative to the bank (which is presumably what the problem is lookoing for, although it's not specified) is the sum of these two vectors.
 
This thread has been moved into the homework forum. You will have to show your work (there's a big hint in the previoius post) and say where you're getting stuck, and then we can help you over the hard spot
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top