Understanding the MC flux limiter

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the monotonized central difference flux limiter used in numerical hydrodynamics. The formula presented involves calculating a derivative with three terms, where the first term represents a standard derivative and the next two terms are scaled derivatives. The confusion arises from the presence of these different terms and their implications for numerical stability and accuracy. Clarification is sought on how these terms interact and contribute to the overall flux limiter function. Understanding this mechanism is crucial for effectively applying the flux limiter in hydrodynamic simulations.
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7
I'm reading through these notes on numerical hydrodynamics. On pg17, they introduce the monotonized central difference flux limiter, which looks something like

\frac{\partial~a}{\partial~x}|_i = min\left({\frac{|a_{i+1}-a_{i-1}|}{2\Delta~x},2\frac{|a_{i+1}-a_{i}|}{\Delta~x},2\frac{|a_i-a_{i-1}|}{\Delta~x}}\right)sign\left(a_{i+1}-a_{i-1}\right)

Now I am a bit confused about what's happening here. The first term in the min looks like a derivative, but the next two terms look like twice the derivative. Can anyone explain what exactly is going on here?


Thanks
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top