Understanding the Meaning of (e1^e2)\cdote3 in Geometric Algebra

JakeD
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What is the meaning of (e1^e2)\cdote3?

(outer product multiplied by inner product)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume of the parallelepiped formed by those vectors.
 
Thank you.

Jake
 
No, this is just wrong! The volume of the parallelepiped would be all outer products, e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge e_3.

(e_1 \wedge e_2) is a bivector. So you're asking: what is the inner product of a vector with a bivector? That has a clear geometrical interpretation. For a vector a and bivector B, a \cdot B does the following:

  1. Project a onto the plane defined by B
  2. Rotate 90 degrees in the "sense" of B
  3. Dilate by the magnitude of B

Note that this uses all three defining characteristics of the bivector B:
  • Attitude (basically the angle the plane makes in space)
  • Orientation (clockwise vs. counterclockwise)
  • Magnitude (i.e. area)

With the inner product used by Hestenes et al, you also have
a \cdot B = - B \cdot a
which let's you answer your question.

By the way, in 3D, your construction is equivalent to the "double cross product" (not the "vector triple product"):
<br /> (e_1 \wedge e_2) \cdot e_3 = - (e_1 \times e_2) \times e_3<br />
Note how the GA version (described above) is much more intuitive and easy to visualize -- the VA version (double cross product) will give you carpal tunnel from all those applications of the right-hand rule!
 
Thanks chogg for your details answer; I later noticed indeed that his answer is wrong.
GAViewer also demonstrates this very nicely.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top