Understanding the Parametric Form of an Ellipse: Step-by-Step Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter winbacker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
Click For Summary
To convert the ellipse equation (x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4 into parametric form, the first step is to rewrite it as \((x+1)^2/4 + y^2 = 1\). This indicates that the ellipse is centered at (-1, 0) with semi-major axis 2 and semi-minor axis 1. The parametric equations are derived by letting x = 2cos(t) - 1 and y = sin(t), aligning with the standard form of an ellipse. The transformation involves recognizing the relationship between the ellipse's parameters and the unit circle's parametric equations. Ultimately, the solution provides a clear method for transitioning from the standard ellipse equation to its parametric representation.
winbacker
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have the solution to a problem and I need help understanding how the solution was obtained.

I have to take an equation of an ellipse and transfer it to parametric form.

The ellipse has the equation: (x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4.

The solution has the ellipse parameterized as follows:

x+1 = 2cost and y = sint

Can someone just explain this translation, step by step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parametric form of an arbitrary ellipse is

\begin{align*}<br /> x &amp;= \alpha\cos t + c_x\\ <br /> y &amp;= \beta\sin t + c_y<br /> \end{align*}<br />

where (c_x, c_y) is its center and \alpha,\beta are constants.

How would you use this to convert your equation to parametric form? Can you find values for any of c_x,c_y,\alpha, or \beta right off the bat?
 
well, I assume the center of the ellipse is at (-1,0). Otherwise I am stumped...how do they get 2cost?? And how is y = sint? I am very confused...
 
You know what, I just thought of a better way to do this.

Recall that in parametric form the equation \frac{x^2}{r^2}+\frac{y^2}{r^2}=1 is
\begin{equation}\tag{1}\begin{align*}<br /> x &amp;=r\cos t\\<br /> y &amp;=r\sin t.<br /> \end{align*}\end{equation}<br />​

So, to put your equation
(x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4​
into parametric form, we need to first do some sort of substitution of variables to get it to look like the equation of a circle. In other words, we want to find functions f and g such that if
\begin{aligned}<br /> x &amp;= f(u,v)\\<br /> y &amp;= g(u,v)<br /> \end{aligned}​
(for new variables u and v), then
\begin{equation}\tag{2}\frac{u^2}{r^2} + \frac{v^2}{r^2} = 1.\end{equation}​
Once we do so, we can put (2) in parametric form as
\begin{equation}\tag{3}\begin{aligned}<br /> u &amp;= r\cos t\\<br /> v &amp;= r\sin t<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
and then (since u will turn out to only depend on x, and v only on y) we can plug in the inverse substitution of (2) to get the parametrization we want.

Let's start by dividing the equation by 4:
\frac{(x+1)^2}{4}+y^2=1.​
The obvious choice for y is to let y=v\ (=g(u,v)).

x, though, is not quite as simple. However, a major benefit of our choice for y is that since \frac{(x+1)^2}{4} doesn't depend on y, it also doesn't depend on v. Thus, instead of finding a function f(u,v), we just need to find a function f(u)! Additionally, notice that by letting y=u, we have effectively chosen r to be 1. So, to we need to find a function f such that
\frac{(f(u)+1)^2}{4}=\frac{u^2}{1}=u^2.​
Solving, we get
f(u)=2u-1\ (=x).​

So, to consolidate, we have
\begin{equation}\tag{4}\begin{aligned}<br /> x &amp;= 2u-1\\<br /> y &amp;= v.<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
Plugging the inverse substitution
\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}<br /> u &amp;= \frac{x+1}{2}\\<br /> v &amp;= y<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
(and r=1) into (3), we have
\begin{align*}<br /> \frac{x+1}{2} &amp;= \cos t\\<br /> y &amp;= \sin t<br /> \end{align*}​
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K